2.0 FAQ - Second Generation Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
2.0 FAQ
Monday, December 20, 2004 7:04 PM
This was susposed to go into James Cahill's FAQ but I was lazy and never got around to fixing it. I posted this before else were and now I''ve fixed most of the errors and added a bit to it, theres still a few spelling errors I think but I'm dont have the time to add to this anymore. And if anyones noticed I havent posted on here much in a while, and to be honest its mostly because I'm sick of all the newbs not searching and asking the same question over and over and new topics rarley come up anymore. Feel free to add this to your FAQ James


<b>2.0 FAQ</b>

by: Mr. Efficiency (Tyrin) and Labora

<b>First the basics:</b>
The 2.0 8 valve SOHC made in Brazil was first introduced in the sunbird, and only the sunbird, when the J platform was first introduced in 1982, and later in 84 a turbo version was introduced that was only available in the Sunbird GT that had a water cooled t-25 turbo that produced 9 pounds of boost but it only lasted until 1990 due to many mechanical flaws and its unreliability, which isn’t so bad if you take care of it properly. The 2.0 and 2.0 turbo better known as the LT3 both went through many changes year to year mostly dealing with oil journals size, and a bunch of different cams, from 84 until 91. In 1982 they were carbureted and later in 83 changed to throttle body injection (TBI) there were two kinds of throttle bodies for this engine from 83 - 86 they had a model 300 throttle body and then from 87 – 90 they had the model 700. Then they were switched over to multi port fuel injection (MPFI) in 1991 and with that change they removed the distributor and had coil packs used instead. Then in 95 when the Sunbird was killed the engine went off the J platform with the car, but is still produced as a DOHC version in Daewoo's. The block is cast iron and has nodular cast iron crankshaft and connecting rods, the turbocharger is a T25 water that provides 9 pounds of boost. And the engine is equipped with a knock sensor that protects the engine from detonation on regular or premium fuel, though premium is preferred and highly recommended for performance use. The car can go 0-60 in 7.2 seconds and does 15.40s in the 1/4 mile @ 91 mph.


<b>Specs:</b>

2.0 TBI NA (VIN K):
HP: 90-102 (heard many variations, I prefer to say 102 cause its highest)@5200 RPM
TQ: 130 @ 2800 RPM
Compression ratio: 8.8:1
Bore x Stroke: 3.38 x 3.38
Firing order: 1342
Intake valve size: 1.69"
Exhaust valve size: 1.44"
Cam: elevation = intake – exhaust: 0.2409 – 0.2409 for 1989
0.2366 – 0.2515 for 1990 – 1991

2.0 MPFI NA (VIN H):
HP: 111@5200 RPM
TQ: 125@3600 RPM
Compression ratio: 9.2:1
Bore x Stroke: 3.38 x 3.38
Firing order: 1342
Intake valve size: 1.69"
Exhaust valve size: 1.44"
Cam: elevation = intake – exhaust: 0.2626 – 0.2626 for 1992 – 1994

2.0 Turbo (VIN M) (engine code: C20GET):
HP: 165@5600 RPM
TQ: 160@2800 RPM
Compression ratio: 8.0:1
Bore x Stroke: 3.38 x 3.38
Firing order: 1342
Intake valve size: 1.69"
Exhaust valve size: 1.44"
Cam: elevation = intake – exhaust: 0.2409 – 0.2409 for 1989
0.2625 – 0.2625 for 1990

<b>2.0 to 2.0 turbo:</b>
This is probably the most often asked question ever when it comes to the 2.0 and so I guess it
makes since to put it on here
To change from a 2.0 to a 2.0 turbo is a lot of work and the easiest way to do it is just to swap
the motors over, cause the only things the two engines share are the block, crankshaft and the
connecting rods. But if for whatever reason you decide to keep your block in your car you need
to swap pistons cause the turbo pistons are forged and the 2.0 NA's are not, you need the turbo
head cause of the compression ratio change, (8.8:1 NA - 8.0:1 turbo) for those of you who think
its stupid to lower compression and gain power with a turbo.....trust me it works. You will also
need all the wiring, ECM, throttle cable, oil pan, intake, exhaust, turbo, down pipe, fuel pump
(unless your car was originally MPFI then its better than the turbo pump) and basically
everything attached to the head except the block, get a turbo head gasket when you get a new
one, obviously, lol and all the air box crap too if you wanna go stock. Transmission change is
also a good idea if it’s a 5 speed, see the "Transmission" section.

<b>Transmission:</b>
The best transmission is obvious for the 2.0, first off a 5 speed is always the way to go they are lighter and you don't lose about 30-35 percent of your power like an automatic and only around 10 percent through a 5spd, and that varies between clutches, so you can easily bring that percent down a little more. But the 5spds are hard to locate so if you have the auto transmission It shouldn’t be to bad unlike the 5spd you won't have to lift the throttle while the transmission shifts allowing the boost to not drop much and just like the 5spd you can always build up the auto with a stall or shift kit etc.

The 2.0 NA comes with an Izuzu trans which isn't very strong but some people have managed to run a "stock" 2.0 turbo on that trans with no problems. But once you start putting down some serious power it won't stand up to it, the Getrag 5 speed trans that comes in the 2.0 turbo is much stronger and can take 300 plus horse power, so there is not to much to worry about with that trans unless you start getting really serious, but a lot of people on the org have made it into the 13's on that trans so I think its the best you can get with out going out and having a hole trans completely rebuilt with all custom gears and everything, but that'll run you up around ten
to twenty thousand dollars or more, that may be a bit of an exaggeration, but you get the point. When you swap over the Getrag trans the drive shafts must be swapped to cause they are also stronger than the ones from the Izuzu trans.

<b>Gear ratios:</b>
HM-282 – Getrag 5 speed (RPO:MG2)
1st - 3.50
2nd - 2.05
3rd - 1.38
4th - 0.94
5th - 0.72
Final Drive Ratio - 3.61:1

TH125C (3T40) - 3 Speed Automatic (RPO: MD9)
1st - 2.84
2nd - 1.6
3rd - 1.0
Reverse - 2.067
Final Drive Ratio - 3.18

Isuzu 5 Speed Manual (RPO: MK7)
1st - 3.91
2nd - 2.18
3rd - 1.45
4th - 1.03
5th - 0.74

Isuzu 4 Speed Manual (RPO: M73) (1.8 trans)
1st - 4.01
2nd - 2.25
3rd - 1.40
4th - 1.00

<b>Mods:</b>
Here is a list of some mods you could do to your 2.0 turbo or NA to get a little more power out of it some of them are a little easier than others and some are just a lot of work, or a little harder to do.

1. The obvious route almost everyone is taking, go turbo.
2. A Cam from a MPFI 2.0 has a higher lift, which holds the valve open longer, ie: more fuel in the cylinder = more power.
3. T-3/T-4 turbo if you want to do it cheap you can get the turbo from a turbo SAAB, Volvo, Mustang and T-bird. You will of course have to redo you piping as well as have a exhaust manifold worked on.
4. See “Grand Am 2.0 turbo” (E-bay search this also for some parts).
5. Intercooler/BOV obvious but needed
6. Manual boost controller (See MBC at bottom links) for about 3 bucks.
7. MPFI swap you can keep your head but you need: injectors, fuel rail, wiring, ECM, throttle body, throttle cable, coil packs (the MPFI cars don’t have a distributor), cap for the end of the head were distributor is supposed to go.
8. If you have a 2.0 turbo put a MPFI throttle body on cause its bigger and bolts right on with little modification, a throttle body from a 2.8 Fiero is even better but requires a little fabrication work.
9. 3.1 radiator always helps to keep things cool, and its aluminum. Since one of the major design flaws of the 2.0 is a Head gasket going bad from overheating this is a good cheap upgrade just have to do a few custom hoses which can be done cheaply.
10. DOHC head swap. See below
11. A check valve or two in the line up to the map sensor to stop the ECM from limiting boost.
12. Water/methanol injection. (See the links at the bottom)


<b>DOHC head swap:</b>
There are two versions of the 2.0 in the UK that are DOHC they are the C20XE which is 2.0 16V DOHC that has 156 horsepower, and in 92 there was a turbo version of it that had 204 horsepower and 205 TQ. The turbo version was called C20LET Both engines use the same block as all the 2.0 Sunbirds, so to swap to a 16 valve DOHC sunbird you need the head, timing belt, timing cover, all the wiring, ECM, intake, exhaust, fuel rail, injectors, etc, etc…… but now you know it is possible. The only problem is shipping from the UK will be really expensive and so will the hole top half of a motor from a fairly new car, but if you got the money why not try it. As far as I know it has yet to be done.

<b>Problems:</b>

Won’t start:
First check for spark by pulling a plug wire and sticking a screw driver in the end while someone cranks over the car if there’s sparks obviously you have spark, if not proceed to “spark”. If you have spark check for fuel by just looking into the throttle body if your TBI, if its carbureted you can just look to see if fuel is in the carb but if you cant just pull a fuel line to see if your getting fuel out of it when the car is being cranked, if your MPFI relive fuel pressure and pull a fuel line and see if gas come out while the car is being cranked over,(put the line in a bottle or something cause the fuel will come out of there pretty quick) make sure your not checking the return. If your getting gas then its ok if not go to “fuel pump”. And if you have gas and spark then there is no reason it shouldn’t start except air sometimes it won't start if the air intake is completely clogged but it very rare that happens. If it won't crank over check battery or starter, if both are good check wiring.

Fuel pump:
First be sure it’s plugged in, lol and make sure all the fuses are fine. But one thing you can do is look around your driver side strut tower around the wiring harness and there should be a single grey wire hanging lose with a plug on the end that's not plugged into anything. with the ignition key in the "run" position apply 12 volts of power to the end of the plug, and the fuel pump should come on, If it doesn’t that means there is a break in the wires somewhere between the fuel pump and the ignition or the relay. If the pump does work then that means the relay is gone, the relays are located on the passenger side behind the shock tower, there little black boxes with white numbers stamped on them, pull out the relays(only one is for the fuel pump) to find which one is for the fuel pump look at the wires that are going into the back of the relay , look for a pink wire with a black stripe on it and a grey wire, (they should be going into the same relay) these are the fuel pump wires pull the cap off the relay and find one piece of wire and strip the ends then put one end of it on the metal prong of the plug the grey wire is attached to and put the other end of the wire on the metal prong the pink/black wire is attached to, if you do this with the ignition in the run position and the fuel pump works, and you pull the wire off and the pump dies the relay is gone and that is your problem. If your still not getting gas flush the fuel lines to make sure there not clogged/plugged, also be sure your injectors are getting power on positive and they are properly grounded.

Spark:
If you have no spark first check all your plug wires, make sure there in good shape and all plugged in properly. Then check the coil and be sure it is getting power and distributing it as well, if none of that works check all your wiring into the coil and be sure its all properly grounded.

<b>Random facts:</b>
-Carbureted models have a mechanical fuel pump mounted on the block on the side facing the front of the car, TBI and MPFI cars have electric fuel pumps in the gas tank.
-The 2.0 turbo and the Getrag transmission were only available in the sunbird GT until 1990, the 2.0 turbo and the Getrag trans never came in any other J-body from the factory.
-From 82-85 the 2.0 came with E2SE carburetor.
-In 86 the 2.0 had a model 300 throttle body.
-From 87-91 the 2.0 had a model 700 throttle body.
-From 92-94 the 2.0 had multi port fuel injection (MPFI).

<b>Info:</b>
Almost all the info here I learned from nine months on the org and my Chiltons manuals (for specs)
http://www.lt3.reallyrules.com
http://www.c-speedracing.com/howto/mbc/mbc.php MBC
http://www.v6z24.com Mostly Z24 stuff, but there is some info on the 2.0 in there.
http://www.dawesdevices.com/water.html
<br>



Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:51 AM
WOW! That alot of stuff!!!!! I'll get it in there! Thanks!
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:32 PM
Does anybody know anything about the cam in block 2.0?
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:04 PM
wow lots of info. i have 2 questions tho
1. (11. A check valve or two in the line up to the map sensor to stop the ECM from limiting boost.) could u explain that im a newbie
2. with a manuel boost controller wat psi do u run it at(stock turbo)
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 21, 2004 7:27 PM
89cxsport: I know hardly anything about the 2.0 and 2.2 OHV motors, this FAQ is for a completley diffrent motor.

89 turb0: 1. After a certian ammount off boost is reached (I forget the exact number) the ECM will cut fuel, The map sensor is what tells the ECM how much boost your running, so by putting a check valve in the line going up to the map sensor it bleeds off the boost before it hits the map sensor and tricks the ECM into thinking your running less boost.
2. I'm not quite sure what you mean by that, with a manual boost controller you can run almost any psi you want (with in reason of engine limitations and how adjustable the controller is) and I cant remember how much the motor runs stock, something around 6-9 psi.
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 2:09 PM
ok i get the check value, but wat i meant in the 2nd question was, with a 2.0L turbo, stock everything wats the highest psi u could run it at without hurting your engine. and ya i think its around 9psi stock. ive heard at different sites of people running 15-18psi on stock internals is it possible?
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:08 PM
There is no absolute number to how high you can go, its just a big guessing game, you can up it as far as you dare to, every motor will be diffrent, it all depends on how well it was taken care of , how well it was treated during its break in period and how much the previous owners beat on it. I'd say 15 - 18 is a little much with out an intercooler but it would most likely be ok, without an intercooler I would never go past 18-20. (others may say diffrent cause nobody really knows for sure) Thats why I think its a good idea to rebuild the motor so you can take care of it from the begining and have less chance of breakage later down the line, thats what I plan to do to mine soon. So if you think your engine is in good enough shape to run that much boost give it a try, but if its not in great shape theres a possibility of breaking things.
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:46 PM
alright thanks man
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:48 PM
so if a stock 2.0 has 9psi do u think i could raise it to 15 w/o an intercooler with an above average kept motor
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:11 PM
well, its kinda hard to say, I dont want to tell you yes and have you do it and blow your motor then I would feel totaly responsable and I dont want you to blow up. But I would say, yes you should probobly be ok
Actually as long as you dont put the check valve in line to the map sensor you are pretty safe as far as over boosting, do some research and see what the psi the ECM cuts fuel at and just go a little lower than that on a stock motor and you are 99 percent safe from blowing up.
Just out of curiousity, What is everyone running for psi on there 2.0 turbos?
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:42 PM
Actually, people can get bone stock 2.0 turbo's into the 13's by just upping the boost, and it runs 15's factory so I say your most likley ok at 15 psi, but a intercooler is a really good idea if your uping boost at all, cooler air is much better for the motor. also if your upping the boost so far that you need to trick the map sensor then you need a way to get more fuel into the motor or you'll run to lean and definatly start breaking things, If your upping the boost at all you NEED a air/fuel guage to make sure your not running to rich or lean (lean is too much air, rich is to much fuel) running rich is ok, but not great on emmisions. Running lean is bad if you run to lean you risk detonation and breaking things. To get more fuel into the motor you need a fuel pressure regulator, just up the pressure and watch the A/F guage until your satisfied with how it reads, or the other route is to add an extra injector or two but thats a bit more work. I'm going to run propane injection so I can run really high boost with out detonation cause propane is 110 octane but that set up also takes more work, well worth it though.
Also just in case you dont know what detonation is, its when you get more air then fuel into the engine and the cylinders get to hot and the mixture explodes before the spark goes off thus trying to make the piston go down before its reached TDC (top dead center) and tries to force the motor in reverse causeing maojor damage to pistons crank and connecting rods, most of the time it will just melt a piston though.
<br>



Re: 2.0 FAQ
Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:43 PM
O yeah, one last thing: ^^^^^^ Thats why water injection is good it keeps the cylinders cooler also letting denser air in, which gets more air cause it more compact.
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Thursday, December 23, 2004 7:48 PM
alright thanks man, but if i do wreck my motor i wont blame it on u
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Friday, December 24, 2004 9:54 AM
I ran 10-12 psi usually on my 89 Sunbird when it had the stock turbo. Once I upgraded the turbo to a T3/T4b turbo I turned the boost up to 13 psi(intercooled) but really, that turbo was too big for that motor.


Stock fuel cut hits at 14 psi of boost. I ran 15 psi with a bleeder valve on the MAP sensor with the larger turbo with no problems, but I was also running water injection.

From what I've learned form talking to some fellow Turbo Bird owners, the stock turbo pretty much maxxes out around 12-13 psi. And, since it is non-intercooled you will just be pumping more heat than anything when you start raising it above that point(which is not recomended really). If you added water injection, you could then safely raise that up to around 14-15 psi, if you're spraying enough fluid!

. <br>

.
91 Cav "GT"<-- R.I.P.
91 Cavalier Wagonstein - Turbocharged wagon goodness
You can take my rifle when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Re: 2.0 FAQ
Friday, December 24, 2004 7:53 PM
so basically ur saying, stock everything u can run 12-13psi, and with waterinjection and intercooler u can run 15psi? i just want 2 make sure
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Friday, December 24, 2004 7:54 PM
and wat happened when u installed the t3/t4b turbo, u said it was to big for the motor.. could u explain that, like wat goes wrong?
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Saturday, December 25, 2004 5:25 AM
i dont see how a t3/t4 would be too big.....i love my TD06, and its about the same if not bigger than a t3/t4 <br>

WARNING: I bring nothing to the table.

Re: 2.0 FAQ
Saturday, December 25, 2004 2:34 PM
That turbo was too big for a couple of reasons.

1. full boost was not seen till around 3500-4000 rpm
2. boost did not start to come on till around 2500 rpm
3. the car was an automatic
4. it was soo big, that at idle, the exhaust would not even turn the wheels!!

So, the car was SLOW off the line, even if I power braked it at the track. I should have gone with a small T3 Super 60 turbo. That would have spoooled up quicker, gave better low end, and been able to get that heavy car off the line without falling off at redline like a lot of small turbos do.


With the factory turbo, if you were to do either water injection of intercool it, you could turn the boost up to 15 psi, IF you do something to prevent the computer from seeing that much boost(MAP clamp, or bleeder valve). I personally would not go any higher than that period with the stock turbo though.

. <br>

.
91 Cav "GT"<-- R.I.P.
91 Cavalier Wagonstein - Turbocharged wagon goodness
You can take my rifle when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Re: 2.0 FAQ
Sunday, December 26, 2004 10:47 PM
Basically you can tell if a turbos to big for a motor if the motor has a hard time spooling the turbo up, and you get a lot of lag.
<br>


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Monday, December 27, 2004 6:13 AM
Mr.Efficiency (Tyrin) wrote:Basically you can tell if a turbos to big for a motor if the motor has a hard time spooling the turbo up, and you get a lot of lag.


thankyou captain obviouse

im just saying, the td06 is bigger, and mine spins fine at idle and spools fine, sure, there is lag, but a decent amount of lag in our cars is a good thing unless your running slicks. our cars have 00000000 traction. my car doesnt move untill 3000, and full boost comes on at around 3800 now, with the ported head it was about 35-3600. but thats fine with me, cause if i shift at redline it only drops to around 4500 anyways, so once its going, its really going. i think that there was something wrong with your turbo. a t3/t4 hybrid should spool just fine <br>

WARNING: I bring nothing to the table.

Re: 2.0 FAQ
Monday, December 27, 2004 9:01 AM
Keep in mind that my car was an automatic. That alone makes the turbo spool up slower.

. <br>

.
91 Cav "GT"<-- R.I.P.
91 Cavalier Wagonstein - Turbocharged wagon goodness
You can take my rifle when you pry it from my cold dead hands.


Re: 2.0 FAQ
Monday, December 27, 2004 12:18 PM
but there is no turbo lag either, so auto is just as good as manual for turbo sunbirds
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Monday, December 27, 2004 4:14 PM
There's no turbo lag in between gears, yes. However, because there is less lode on the motor with an automatic transmission, it will spool up slower. Thus, the automatic transmission would be playing catch up with a 5 speed.

Now, if the turbo were smaller like Ned's was/is then it would be the other way around.

. <br>

.
91 Cav "GT"<-- R.I.P.
91 Cavalier Wagonstein - Turbocharged wagon goodness
You can take my rifle when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:44 PM
Just a couple of points on the 16v head swap.

Wether you do an N/A or turbo 16v swap you need to use the appropriate 16v pistons as they have valve reliefs cut into them. You could use the 8v ones but they will need the reliefs cut into them to clear the valves.

The 16v head from the Daewoos can also be used on the 8v or just swap the entire engine from a 2.0L Daewoo.

The cost of 16v parts is getting cheap now in the UK. An entire 16v engine can be bought for around £100-£200 GBP depending on condition. It's the shipping which is the killer if buying these parts.

As for using the T3 turbos, a 50 trim T3 is probably the best all-rounder and a Super 60 with a 0.48 turbine housing would be good for 300-350hp on these engines. A 0.63 turbine housing would be a bit laggy but can be used.
You can get a cast T3 manifold from Brazil which uses an external wastegate for these engines. I've managed to track one down and I'm using it my "LT3" engine. Here's a couple of pics. The turbo on it btw is a T3/T4 hybrid which I had, so you can see that one of that size will physically fit but it is a little too big for our engines and their 8v cylinder heads (a 16v head would probably be ok).







Stef

<br>

LT3 Powered Vauxhall Astra.
Fiero TB, Mopar Super 60 Injectors, SDS Stand Alone EFI, Ported Big Valve Head, Early XE Crank, Cast T3 Manifold With External Wastegate + More
Re: 2.0 FAQ
Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:03 PM
Sweet!!

. <br>

.
91 Cav "GT"<-- R.I.P.
91 Cavalier Wagonstein - Turbocharged wagon goodness
You can take my rifle when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search