2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it) - Page 4 - Photos & Media Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:33 AM
ROFL @ ^ thats a good point hahahha




Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Saturday, November 11, 2006 6:05 AM
WOW...im extremely impressed, and i agree with one person's previous assesment, you are definitley a pioneer. im keeping posted to this thread, and EAGERLY awaiting some dyno numbers!!!


_________________________________________________________________

this useless post brought to you by the alcoholic known as LUNDiS



Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Saturday, November 11, 2006 10:49 PM
Scott, this is josh, from Missouri. I am the one who had the 95 Sunfire Gt. If you get a chance call me @(660)342-8194..........


Your dreams are rich.....Live by your dreams.....
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, November 12, 2006 8:17 AM
just letting you guys know..the engien is IN the car and mounted up ..more pics to come soon



Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, November 12, 2006 8:29 AM
okay im ready for the new pics


"HONDA" tech wana-be

Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:31 AM
Awsome work man. I am going to be building an engine this summer, might look into this instead. Have you written the instructions and list of parts yet? nice job.


PS3 ID: Phatchance249
MW3 FTW!
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:40 PM
about the 99 Z question.. it'll run better when fully tuned, and you can flash tune a 99

again awesome work!! also I would grab the adjustable cam gears and run double row chains.. this is the true king of Quad's. Not the first on the block, but the first I know of on OUR block!



Sven you totally quarterloafed your computer..
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, November 16, 2006 5:45 PM
i dont even know what im looking at but it looks nice. nigga nasty


2001 2 door five speed 122k.
custom steering linkage pop
2000 s10 (THE WORKS)

Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Saturday, November 25, 2006 8:19 PM
scott whats goin on with this dude, last i heard it was dead on the side of the road....




Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, December 10, 2006 2:36 PM
wow...been away for a while, but man this is an insane build. Great job. Hopefully it is runnng well.





-da chinchilla
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, December 10, 2006 4:20 PM
MORE PICS




Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:34 AM
any new pics?
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:41 AM
hes still workin on it. dont know if hell ever get done


I NEED a 97-99 LD9 engine harness for an auto.PM if u hav info.!!
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:48 AM
it'll get dun i dont see why not every problem is solvable
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Thursday, March 22, 2007 4:34 PM
this looks awesome


great job!!!!!


thats gonna be one nice engine





Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:14 PM
sexy


"still want to smash that like the fist of an angry god"
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Wednesday, August 26, 2009 6:28 PM
ok so the noodle is a goin...

you did a 2.4 style water pump in the 2.3 timing chain housing when you did the single row?? or you put a single row chain gear on it?? help me here because i am lost. the timing chain housing is one for a dual or single row? (ive never even seen the double row setup before in my life so excuse my stupidity here).

so power steering... you just axed the 95 pump and ran the hoses to the older belt driven one and it worked perfectly?

what year block is that?? couldnt you essentially do this same stuff to a 95 block and just do an older oil pump swap to make it better?


when you tear it down you should check your timing chain to see if it stretched.... ya know just to see...


and lastly... you've got 9.7:1 pistons?? and the stroke change upped the compression? i still dont quite get this part...



Familiar Taste of Poison.
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:22 AM
looks good


Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, August 30, 2009 11:45 AM
so your not using the stock mount location because you don't wanna spend the money on a mount?? is that what i got out of an earlier post?? if so i hope you plan to re-enforce the rad support bar you will be making less torque them me but i do know those j upper rad supports aren't designed to take the tugging on

als the lower stock j engine mount is the torqueing moun as is the 2 you are putting in what are you using to keep the engine up, thats what the stock upper does

on the 3800s ( think the cutlass does aswell not sure tho) uses a puck style mount to support it vertically and those dog bones are for the torquing. 3 torque mounts and no vertical mount may give you issues when you install it



JBO since July 30, 2001
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, August 30, 2009 11:48 AM
please check post dates. since this has been together for like 3 years I doubt he's having mount issues

only reason this is up top is because Brad asked a question which still hasn't been answered (which like, I'd answer - but I don't know the answer).



- Interior FAQ -
J-Body of Michigan -
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Sunday, August 30, 2009 12:41 PM
whoa lol
i didnt answer brad cus i already answered him via IM.
and yes this engine has been running for a while now, put down 209whp all motor
all current problems / rebuilding / pics are up in performance section
as for the mounts im not exactly sure what you were refering to, if its the 2 upper dog bones then the answer is i had INTENDED to use them WITH the stock mounts..but it didnt work out
so i only used the stock mounts and thru the uppers in a box in my garage lol

as for all the questions
its an LGO block, with a 1995 quad4 timing set which was single row yet still retained the quad style water pump rather than the 2.4 pump which requires the removal of the timing to change it
the 95 quad pump is much easier to change if it goes bad
yes i ran the stock power steering lines to the old pulley style pump and it works fine
yes, my chain stretched over time ( i had a used one installed) so a new chain and tensioner was installed recently
and yes i went with a dished piston and still raised the compression..when you increase stroke you increase compression , even if the deck height didnt change
currently this engine is back appart and being rebuilt bigger and stronger..be prepared for more HP in the future




Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Monday, May 23, 2016 3:18 PM
was that a vin-A 2.3 block?
Re: 2.6L quad4 stroker PICS (56k dont try it)
Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:09 PM
It shouldn't matter / I would go with a 89-94 block.




Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search