2.4twin VS. Ecotec - Page 2 - Racing Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 5:13 AM
Um Cody... That was YOUR time and PJ definately was all-motor.


----------------------------
<<<<<2003 Sunfire Sedan>>>>>


Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 7:48 AM
Oh I got mixed up here,when pj compared times I thought he was comparing my times and bigs times,and even if pj is comparing my times with his times then how is calling my car slow when his mod list is ENDLESS!And claims to be the "fastest N/A cavalier ever"I dont think my car is the fastest cavalier straight from the factory,cause all I got is just minor bolt ons,I havent opened up the motor now pj has opened up his motor a countless amount of times and has had his car WAY longer than me,its like comparing apples to oranges,I mean if he has the fastest n/a cavalier doesnt that mean that he is saying everybodys car on here is slow that is n/a,I mean really everyone says that there is allways gonna be a faster car out there but not the "fastest n/a cavalier.................



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 11:27 AM
Cody Farrington wrote:And claims to be the "fastest N/A cavalier ever"

Believe that title goes to Wenzel.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edited Friday, August 22, 2008 11:29 AM


Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 11:30 AM
Unless killer quad swaps bodys.....

Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 11:31 AM
also...

C) 2.3/2.4 L Twin Cam N/A
1. Karo, 13.125 @ 101.01

Chris




'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 1:09 PM
Joe Schulte wrote:
Cody Farrington wrote:And claims to be the "fastest N/A cavalier ever"

Believe that title goes to Wenzel.



oh man! haahahahahah! thats messed up, Ben is a good guy. He's trying. He will get there, he just needs a few extra grand! lol



Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 7:50 PM
Sorry Paul is a good guy,but not my type Cody, and yes my car is sadly scrap metal now due to a Buck, but I did get his horns,lol.All motor,I still would have probably lost a race to you based soley on the fact that we all know Verts. are "PIGS"(3200 lbs.)and yes my 1/8 mile and 60' IS faster due to nitrous but hey so what?



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 10:05 PM
I hate the ld9 or 2.3 or anything that is related to the quad, but seriously cody you're making ecotec owners look like ass holes stfu before pj and chris eat you for lunch.



---------------------------------------------------
4 Cams...32 Valves...5 Liters...This Could Get Fun!


Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 11:04 PM
Skunk wrote:I hate the ld9 or 2.3 or anything that is related to the quad, but seriously cody you're making ecotec owners look like ass holes stfu before pj and chris eat you for lunch.


Ecotec owners are ass holes lol, and Im pretty sure everyone knows that you hate quad motors..

See ya this weekend buddy !




.
.

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Friday, August 22, 2008 11:10 PM
..well..

MY LS1 owns ya ALL!



On a happier note, with real gas, ( not the @!#$ 10% alcohol crap) my car gets 24 MPG average (the LS1...)




Chris




'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:27 AM
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:..well..

MY LS1 owns ya ALL!



On a happier note, with real gas, ( not the @!#$ 10% alcohol crap) my car gets 24 MPG average (the LS1...)




Chris


my LS1 is better



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:15 AM
does it have LS6 heads and intake?

Chris




'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:22 AM
99redz24 wrote:
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:..well..

MY LS1 owns ya ALL!



On a happier note, with real gas, ( not the @!#$ 10% alcohol crap) my car gets 24 MPG average (the LS1...)




Chris


my LS1 is better


I have a 92' Mark VIII with a 4.6L out of a 93 Cobra I'll run ya' with,lol.

Actually it needs a HG and is for sale for $1200 if anyone is interested



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:19 PM
Cody Farrington wrote:Oh ok big thanks oh and,your wheels are real impressive .......hahahahahahaha.................


Well I couldn't complain for $125 w/tires and again I'm not impressed by stock rims.On a side note,I looked at your MySpace and I'm UBER impressed at your "fly-by's" FLMAO.,and the fact that you "go and look for people to race on the highway" proves that your not really mature for an 18 yr. old



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 7:30 AM
BIGGSZ24 wrote:
Well I couldn't complain for $125 w/tires and again I'm not impressed by stock rims.On a side note,I looked at your MySpace and I'm UBER impressed at your "fly-by's" FLMAO.,and the fact that you "go and look for people to race on the highway" proves that your not really mature for an 18 yr. old


Uh oh, that one might burn a little on these forums.

-Travis


I'll save the world in a minute, now let me finish my Whopper.
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 8:24 AM
BIGGSZ24 wrote:
Cody Farrington wrote:Oh ok big thanks oh and,your wheels are real impressive .......hahahahahahaha.................


Well I couldn't complain for $125 w/tires and again I'm not impressed by stock rims.On a side note,I looked at your MySpace and I'm UBER impressed at your "fly-by's" FLMAO.,and the fact that you "go and look for people to race on the highway" proves that your not really mature for an 18 yr. old


yeah me too. i was impressed he said "cava-beast". lmao



Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 11:59 AM
Oh ok guys So no one on here ever street raced in there whole life yeah right you fu**ing hipicrits,I don't care what you all think.I love my car,and don't care what people think about the name I gave it "cava-beast",I smoke most the cars around my town anyways so everyone refers to it as that name so STFU,I smoke modded tiburon gt,01 eclipse gt v6,v6 mustang,v6 camaro,tegs,civics,other cavaliers in my town,bmw 325,All the new trucks.and many more.So I think thats pretty good for what the car is ,I know you whiney little girls wont give props,you will just criticize and make fun,but show me what your doing that is so different.Any one that lives around me bring it on then....................You all try to act all politically correct what a bunch of pansy's............



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:08 PM
Oh Lord,another newb trying to show us how fast his cav is and trying to justify it,lol.Ok for one,no one is trying to be politicially correct here.Many of us have run other places than the track BUT the track IS the safest and SMARTEST place to race,keep goin on the streets until you ACCIDENTLY run someone over that didn't get out of the way soon enough OR until you get a drag racing ticket which in Mi. is oh about $1500 and 6 points.Secondly,the cars you listed are about as impressive as your ability to spell correctly,OMG dude your cav has a whoppin 140hp stock and you seriously think you can brag?When you achieve something like PJ or Boosted2.4 or Lenko,etc; or can have an intelligent,witty,argument,then come back and talk,until then you sound like a whiny kid trying too hard to prove that your econobox is all that.Goodday to you!!



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 1:37 PM
Oh ok so the cars I smoke arent that fast......hahahaha.....what do you expect to be an immpresive match for a cavalier?????Our cars are Not fast,I no that,I guess I have to have the fastest cavalier in the world that beats cobras and trans ams,just to impress you guys,god da**



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:00 PM
No,but don't come off like an A**,I came to this site with an attitude and fought with everyone until I was put in my place and now I try to help anyone I can even though I dont' own a J Body anymore.Many here are the same,don't act like a jerk and we'll help you out with info you need.



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:02 PM
alright man cool.When you getting another j?



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq

Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:06 PM
I was going to lose this b**ch fest anyways cause its always everyone against me,and I cant take on everyone on this site.Im always wrong i guess,but whatever.



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:06 PM
Not anytime soon,I still am selling the last parts from the car,it was sad to see it go.



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:14 PM
I bet,so how bad was the damage and how fast was you going when the damn thing ran out in front of you?Was it considered totaled?



13.520 @ 98mph! 220whp 234tq
Re: 2.4twin VS. Ecotec
Sunday, August 24, 2008 2:27 PM
http://www.j-body.org/forums/read.php?f=59&i=9412&t=9412

$2k in damage hit the deer at 50mph



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search