95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang... - Other Cars Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:55 PM
Ok well today I was out in my drive messing around putting in my new subs I got and I went to go take my car around the block and I look at the corner and there was a brand new 2005 Mustang well I pulled out of my drive and there was mud on my tires so the spun a little andd then the guy in his mustang floored his car and spun his tires around the corner so I sped up and caught him well he tried to take off again and he got a little ahead and I downshifted into 4th gear nd gained sme speed and caught up and he tried to pull away but he couldnt. Then I come home and I find out that Ford only put a 4.6L in their V8. What a wonderful day besides it started to snow again



*95 Z28 M6* *Free mods* *160 t-stat*New LT1 Crate motor 357*Edelbrock Headers*3" Flowmaster cat back* !CAT

Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:59 PM
I'd still rather own that mustang than a 10 yr old Camaro... Maybe it's just me.


Dark blue 2002 Z24, 2.4 Ltr.
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 8:17 PM
I'd take a New Stang over a 10 year old camaro. But Id take a GTO over a new mustang. But funny stuff.



Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 8:24 PM
Id love to have the new GTO. But the thing is I beleive if you buy an automatic you gotta pay an extra $1000 in gas guzzler tax WTF is that bull@!#$?



*95 Z28 M6* *Free mods* *160 t-stat*New LT1 Crate motor 357*Edelbrock Headers*3" Flowmaster cat back* !CAT
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:22 PM
i would so take that camaro over a P.O.S. rustang
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:36 PM
sorry i don't like fords i had to put 20g's in the rear end and the 3.8L motors are @!#$ my mom went threw 2 and she drives 20 under the speed limit and plus i love comaro's
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:42 PM
20g's in the rear? what a liar
the 3.8l's are @!#$, at least the old ones are.


the 4.6l is putting out 300 horses
which is 25 more than your car does stock




Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:57 PM
*cough*torque*cough*




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe Im just pissed, pissed that my freinds are spineless, What else would you
call abandoment some night, when you're in a fight, and they could make things right?
Spineless. I miss some of my old friends, the ones who you could count on,
bet a huge amount on, the fact that they'd always have your back... Its like a kick in
the sack, just knowing, you've got nothing to fall back on. @!#$ this, Im done.
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:12 PM
justin rockwell wrote:i would so take that camaro over a P.O.S. rustang


I would too.

Wait until (if) the new Camaro comes out. Mustang? What's that?



Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:24 PM
themarin8r wrote:20g's in the rear? what a liar
the 3.8l's are @!#$, at least the old ones are.


the 4.6l is putting out 300 horses
which is 25 more than your car does stock

yea 20g's thats what i said and thats what the dealer would of chagred but she had a warranty and i don't care about 25 ho more it's a ford .....but i give them props they circle there problem...and the 3.8L are @!#$ but the V8 are ok
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:28 PM
I find this hard to believe unless u have serious mods, either that or the mustang couldnt drive/ or was just not racing. LT1's arent saying much either for a 5.7L.




Check Out My Domain Page!!!

Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:33 PM
no just the rear diff went out like it was @!#$ up ...i dunno if the dealer tried to screw her ower or what but that had to be replaced
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:41 PM
Quote:

i dunno if the dealer tried to screw her ower


*sigh*...nevermind; you've already buried yourself enough.



Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:47 PM
The 8.8 in the Mustang is a hell of a lot better than the 10 bolt in the Camaro, not to mention the '05's have 31 spline axles. The first of the reflashed PCM's have come out, times are in the 13.1 range at 106+ with just this on stock tires. It will not be too long before the reflashed Mustangs are running in the 12's on street tires with no other mods. I hate the styling, but when the drive by wire is defeated the 3 valve engine really shines, and you have to remember, it's the base model V-8
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:52 PM
lt1 manual is a low 14 sec car

ive seen one of the reflashed stangs runnig low thirteens

bs on the 12's on street tires w/ no other mods

and it wont be too long before they all start to break



Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 12:35 AM
if i may chime in...

i think the 04 mustangs looked better than the new ones..



Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 1:05 AM
sappyL61 wrote:lt1 manual is a low 14 sec car

ive seen one of the reflashed stangs runnig low thirteens

bs on the 12's on street tires w/ no other mods

and it wont be too long before they all start to break


No BS about it, all it is going to take is a good driver. It will happen, and it's going to happen soon. And what makes you think they are going to break from a 93 octane tune?
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 1:08 AM
This thread can shed some light on one such car, there is another on Stangnet:

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=340768
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 1:08 AM
Quote:

LT1's arent saying much either for a 5.7L.


Can you say Torque? my 96' Z28 BONE stock ran 14.0's at 98mph with a ton of wheelspin, and thats an AUTO. I now have a 430HP LT4 kit.

Quote:

lt1 manual is a low 14 sec car


More like high 13's

All in all id MUCH rather buy my 9 year old Z28 with 20K on the ticker for around 8G's then buy a 30K mustang and run the same times. You do the math.


<img src=http://registry.gmenthusiast.com/images/zipnbyu/personal_pic.jpg>
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 5:17 AM
EastCoastBeast II wrote:if i may chime in...

i think the 04 mustangs looked better than the new ones..



Amen brother........I would consider a 04 Mach1 in competition orange but I don't ever wanna be seen in a 05+ Mustang.Damn chick cars.



I ain't callin u a gold digga,but you ain't messin wit a broke cracka
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 10:58 AM
my bad about the time on the z28
my friend had a ragged out one that ran 14's

so ford has a 300hp v8 gm has 400,500hp v8s now

05gtos are faster than the 05 mustang also
only reason they arent reflashed yet is because companies are working on the ls2 computer




Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 12:03 PM
Well i guess i would never buy an f-body if it didnt come with an ls1.




Check Out My Domain Page!!!
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 2:02 PM
I'll take a T/A thanks

Styling over the camaro... I'll take that. I'd rather have an old poncho than a new ford.



<a href="http://www.canada.ca"><img src="http://img63.exs.cx/img63/6743/ca.gif" alt="Canada.ca" border="0"></a> <a href="http://www.truthout.org">All the News that's not fit to broadcast at CNN, FOX, NBC, ABC or CBS</a>
<img src="http://www.j-body.org/registry/kmikl/personal_pic.jpg">
I've been reading a lot lately of the negative effects of smoking, drinking,
overeating, and casual sex... I have decided to give up reading.
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 3:12 PM
sappyL61 wrote:my bad about the time on the z28
my friend had a ragged out one that ran 14's

so ford has a 300hp v8 gm has 400,500hp v8s now

05gtos are faster than the 05 mustang also
only reason they arent reflashed yet is because companies are working on the ls2 computer


Ford's V-8 is the base model. It's a simple matter of corporate policy why they did not simply offer it with a better state of tune, one is the C.A.F.E. standards (Ford sells way more Mustangs than G.M. did F-bodies) demands that the Mustang get decent gas mileage. Ford readily offered the aftermarket the OBD V program codes and it is already being used even though the car has already been out a few months. Who cares about a GTO being faster than the base model GT? Let's compare it when the Mach I and Cobra get here as they will be very close in price. The GT is already smoking the GTO with under $1,000 in mods, so the value just in that, and the fact that it is the hottest car in America right now, make it a better value in my opinion.
Re: 95 Camaro Z28 VS 2005 Mustang...
Friday, February 18, 2005 3:15 PM
Almost forgot, that 400 HP Vette is not running any better times than the C-5, it suffers from the same drive by wire gremlins that saddle the '05 Mustang.
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search