Well as I'd take the Cobalt SS of course. Nothing against the RSX Type S but I don't think the low torque would make for that fun of a daily driver. Its up to you and what we say doesn't mean squat. Just test drive them both and pick what ever you like.
"Fiery words fuel debate and debate yields understanding"
My vote goes to the Cobalt SS.
uhh rsx-s hands down
1) k20
2) at least 35 whp untapped hp with race header intake and exhaust
3) my buddy has an rsx-s with intake, race header, exhaust, hondata k-pro, and a jackson racing s/c runnin 7lbs of boost and redlines at 8700 rpm WITH STOCK INTERNALS!! VTEC is from 3800 all the way to 8700. 300 whp
4) i was in his car when he upset a c5 vette on the interstate. u should have seen the dudes face LOL
5) the cobalt looks good but the rsx is gorgeous
_________________________________________________________________
EFFICIENCY DETECTIVE
Fast cars. I respect them ALL. Brand elitism is for fanbois and benchracers
daily: 99 civic Si
deceased: 95 cavy '00 LD9 auto swap (vandalized)
RSX for sure.. Shouldn't even be hard to decide.. RSX is going to have a much better resale value and be a lot more reliable..
Dark blue 2002 Z24, 2.4 Ltr.
I say you test drive both....and whichever you like more then buy it.....
RSX.........you WONT be dissapointed.
As many have said, the RSX has ALOT of untapped power and takes to mods like a fish to water, unlike any 4cyl in a while. If you are going to mod either, go RSX. If you are keeping it stock? Toss up....
<img src="http://members.aol.com/mike738247/images/slickstikz24sig.jpg">
RSX
the interior of a Cobalt is still made by GM, and the interior of an RSX is, well, an Acura.
