Bush... stupid or retarded.... - Page 4 - Politics and War Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:23 AM on j-body.org
Hey, I'd be a damned good president...

At least I could speak to people candidly and not f**k up tenses, make up BS words, or try and throw in as many references to one tragedy as possible and use it to justify my every action

Frankly, you can do better than Bush, but the people worth voting for don't run because they know it's more hassle than it's actually worth.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.



Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:46 PM on j-body.org
I could do better.

by the time a month would have passed though, congress would have wanted to impeach me with how much power i'd strip from the government and put back into the hands of the people.


Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:38 PM on j-body.org
No, they'd want to impeach your godless ass because you'd make solstice/equinox a national holiday.

Hell, I'd put forward a 5 week holiday system... Seems to work fine for Germany.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:26 PM on j-body.org
My Cars slower than your Car!! wrote:Either way, the majority elected Bush, and if you don't like it, run for pres in 08 and make some changes.

that's gonna be tough to do, since my family doesn't own a condiment corporation and isn't oil tycoons. being president isn't about being the most-qualified or having the best ideas; it's about who you know and how much money you have.







Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:29 PM on j-body.org
Actually, if you remeber the KOTL for president:

my stance would be this:

All buisnesses would have Floating holiday schedules. you are by law allocated at least XX amount of hours for paid holidays that are religious in nature. political holidays are always taken (tanksgiving, independence day, veterans day, memorial day, etc.

Further, ALL companies must give Veterans the day off on Veterans day (rememberance day for you canadians).


Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:20 PM on j-body.org
Is President Chris starting to legislate for Canada as well?

Yeah, I'm cheeky.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:31 PM on j-body.org
you be the judge


dan
Attachments
president-bush copy.jpg (22k)


BLAH!!
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:31 PM on j-body.org


here is what is in the attachment for the people that are not premium

dan


BLAH!!
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:59 PM on j-body.org
If I were President, I would promote a free america. Free from islam, free from liberalism, free from freedom of speech against the President, and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house for narcotics and explosives. Each citizen would live free and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because some have abused thier freedom's.


Smile, Jesus loves you!!!!! <><
Manchild-ProPain, out now, Sphereofhiphop.com
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 6:40 AM on j-body.org
^^^ Ever read 1984? Ever heard of Nazi Germany? Ever read about Stalinist Russia?




Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 11:27 AM on j-body.org
jbody4jc wrote:If I were President, I would promote a free america. Free from islam, free from liberalism, free from freedom of speech against the President, and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house for narcotics and explosives. Each citizen would live free and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because some have abused thier freedom's.

Wow another ignorant post from a close minded genius(sarcasm as if you couldn't tell ). You'd probably get a few votes from the Religious right nutjobs but the rest of America would probably want you hung for trying to bastardize the constitution.








Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 11:52 AM on j-body.org
i just mentioned rememberance day because that is the equivalent--what was armistice (sp?) day.

I mean hell, my dad fought in 'nam and doesn't get a single thanks about it. Even though that was the equivalent of political masturbation, you pretty much have to thank the soldiers for being willing to go out and fight--and on the day for them, many of them have to work.

That's bull@!#$, i think.


Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 12:26 PM on j-body.org
jbody4jc wrote:If I were President, I would promote a free america. Free from islam, free from liberalism, free from freedom of speech against the President, and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house for narcotics and explosives. Each citizen would live free and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because some have abused thier freedom's.

Another thing It just makes me sick to think that bigoted close minded idiots like you are still around in america. It's 2005 for gods sakes not the 1950's you'd think we would've weeded out these idiots by now. Someday soon hopefully we'll all be above this bullsh!t.







Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 1:21 PM on j-body.org
[quote=Keeper of the Light™]i just mentioned rememberance day because that is the equivalent--what was armistice (sp?) day.

I mean hell, my dad fought in 'nam and doesn't get a single thanks about it. Even though that was the equivalent of political masturbation, you pretty much have to thank the soldiers for being willing to go out and fight--and on the day for them, many of them have to work.

That's bull@!#$, i think.

It's L'Armistice in French colonies... British colonies call it Remembrance Day generically..

And I hear you on the vacation day. It is bull@!#$.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, April 29, 2005 3:01 PM on j-body.org
(The Nation) This column was written by Robert Scheer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice the price of gasoline lately? Isn't it great that we have secured Iraq's oil? And as Congress signs off on yet another huge supplementary grant to supposedly protect U.S. interests in the Mideast, our President pathetically begs his Saudi buddies for a price break. As the fall of Rome showed, imperialism never pays.

Of course, back in 2003, conquering Iraq looked like a great package deal, what with all that oil -- second only to Saudi Arabia -- and the manufactured photo ops of cheering Iraqis. So what if those pesky weapons of mass destruction weren't really there? So what if no solid links to al Qaeda are ever found? This was a win-win, as the corporate guys like to say: Not only would we be able to conduct this operation for next to nothing, we would be welcomed with flowers.

"There is a lot of money to pay for this. It doesn't have to be U.S. taxpayer money," then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told Congress days before the war, in testimony on the potential costs of invading Iraq. "We are talking about a country that can finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon." In the real world, however, this turned out to be utter nonsense.

With approval of the latest spending bill, taxpayers will have been forced to cough up more than $300 billion for the war to date -- above and beyond the annual $400-billion Pentagon budget -- and tens of billions for a bungled reconstruction. Even if the United States can lower its troop commitment to 40,000 troops in Iraq by 2010, as some Pentagon strategists optimistically anticipate, the war could still end up costing U.S. taxpayers up to $646 billion by 2015, according to Rep. John Spratt of South Carolina, the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee. If insurgency, corruption and incompetence continue to plague the U.S. occupation as they have steadily for the last two years, however, the number could surge to a trillion dollars or more.

We need to put such gargantuan numbers in some perspective. The emergency funding that the Senate passed 99 to 0 last week gives the military roughly $80 billion and pays for the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan only through September. That is twice what President Bush insists he needs to cut from the federal support for Medicaid over the next decade.

Already the red state of Missouri is set to end its Medicaid program entirely within the next three years because of a lack of funds. As the Los Angeles Times reported, that will save the state $5 billion, but at the cost of ending healthcare for the more than one million Missourians enrolled in the program. That sum is less than half of what Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney's old company, alone has been paid for reconstruction efforts in Iraq, without much to show for it in terms of improving the Iraqis' quality of life.

Similarly, with roughly 10 percent of what we've spent in Iraq, we could make up the $27 billion federal funding shortfall in paying for Bush's controversial No Child Left Behind Act, which tells public schools that they will be all but scrapped if they don't improve -- yet it doesn't provide the means to do so. This number comes from a lawsuit filed by school districts in Texas, Michigan and Vermont and the National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers organization.

Sadly, these domestic failures provide a far greater long-term threat to our nation's security than the hyped-up claims surrounding our foreign adventures. Abroad, we must "support our troops" at all costs -- even if the cost is their lives -- while at home, the nation's leaders are all about tough love.

"Government is not here to do everything for everybody," admonished Missouri state Rep. Jodi Stefanick, a Republican representing suburban St. Louis. "We have to draw the line somewhere." Just not in Iraq, apparently.

Welcome to late-era Rome, where mindless militaristic expansion is considered patriotic and where demagogues who recklessly waste taxes and young lives in empire-building are deemed valorous. Wolfowitz, for example, has been rewarded for his ignorance and arrogance with the top job at the World Bank.

It is not too late, however, for U.S. to wake up and recall that, in the end, once militarism trumped republicanism, the glory that was Rome proved to be a hollow boast.

<img src=http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2005-04/17351170.jpg>




Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, May 06, 2005 5:39 AM on j-body.org
jbody4jc wrote:If I were President, I would promote a free america. Free from islam, free from liberalism, free from freedom of speech against the President, and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house for narcotics and explosives. Each citizen would live free and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because some have abused thier freedom's.
WOW - I've actually found someone who I wouldn't vote for instead of GWB - and you're it.

Plus your first sentence, when coupled with the rest of your statement, form a complete and total oxyMORON. All you're really suggesting is that you would make America "free" from everything YOU personally don't like - which for anyone that doesn't 100% agree with you is the complete and total opposite of freedom - it's OPPRESSION. Ok then Hitler...

Let me paint you a picture of Hitler's "free" Nazi Germany(not to mention the world had he not been stopped). Free from Judaism(or any Jews for that matter), free from any views not expressed by the Nazi Party, free from freedom of speech against the Fuhrer(german for leader - the position Aldolf Hitler had), and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house(for any reason really). Each citizen DID live "free" and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because the people couldn't be trusted with their freedoms.

Now you're list looks pretty much identical to this and that's kinda scary. Substitute -
Islam for Judaism
Liberal aka non-Nonconservative for non-Nazi
president for fuhrer(almost the German equivalent of president)
modern-day America for Nazi-era Germany
And now you have the same thing.

From everything you have said here - you're ideals are as anti-democracy as you can possibly get. You know democracy - that thing Bush says he's trying to spread in the Middle East - how can you be happy with Bush given the fact that he's (supposedly) spreading something you so clearly despise? Now seeing as how democracy is supposed to be a pretty big cornerstone of the United States of America, that makes you VERY, VERY ANTI-AMERICAN. And I thought it was supposed to be the "Libs" that where anti-american?! But now you're obviously a ultra-conservative, and yet I think I'd need to need a Al Queda pamphlet etc - just to read something just as(and no more) Anti-American than what you wrote, than the sick and twisted America you desire. It scares me that people who think like you still exist, especially in America.




I've never heard of this "part throttle" before. Does it just bolt on?
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, May 06, 2005 7:39 AM on j-body.org
It's really funny too that he calls himself a "true christian" hahahahahahahahahaha couldn't be farther than the truth.







Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Friday, May 06, 2005 8:10 AM on j-body.org
spikej wrote:
jbody4jc wrote:If I were President, I would promote a free america. Free from islam, free from liberalism, free from freedom of speech against the President, and the freedom of the government to randomly search your house for narcotics and explosives. Each citizen would live free and under suspicion by the government at all times. Because some have abused thier freedom's.

Wow another ignorant post from a close minded genius(sarcasm as if you couldn't tell ). You'd probably get a few votes from the Religious right nutjobs but the rest of America would probably want you hung for trying to bastardize the constitution.
Please don't intertwine religion and this person. He has proven time and time again that he is nothing more than a troll and that has nothing to do with religion...at least his form of it.


"Speak the truth, and leave immediately after"
"The urge to save Humanity is almost ALWAYS a false front for the urge to rule"
"He who knoweth things as they are and not as they are said or seem to be, he truly is wise, and is taught of God more than of men."
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Monday, May 23, 2005 7:03 AM on j-body.org
Cnet report on the Homeland Security Authorization Act, which would require that more than 50 percent of the components in any end product bought by the Department of Homeland Security be produced or manufactured in the U.S., writing "The Pentagon has agreements with 21 countries that waive the act, but an amendment that just passed the House would prevent the DHS from waiving the 'Buy American' restrictions. "The president of the Information Technology Association of America observed that this means the DHS may 'have to learn to do without computers and cell phones,' since he could not think of any manufacturers of those devices that would meet the 50% threshold."

http://news.com.com/Buy+American+legislation+draws+fire/2100-1022_3-5715486.html?tag=nefd.top






Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Monday, May 23, 2005 7:20 AM on j-body.org
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Monday, May 23, 2005 7:24 AM on j-body.org
Neighbors spying on neighbors? Mothers forced to turn in their sons or daughters? These are images straight out of George Orwell's 1984, or a remote totalitarian state. We don't associate them with the land of the free and the home of the brave, but that doesn't mean they couldn't happen here. A senior congressman, James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), is working quietly but efficiently to turn the entire United States population into informants--by force.

Sensenbrenner, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman, has introduced legislation that would essentially draft every American into the war on drugs. H.R. 1528, cynically named "Safe Access to Drug Treatment and Child Protection Act," would compel people to spy on their family members and neighbors, and even go undercover and wear a wire if needed. If a person resisted, he or she would face mandatory incarceration.

Here's how the "spy" section of the legislation works: If you "witness" certain drug offenses taking place or "learn" about them, you must report the offenses to law enforcement within 24 hours and provide "full assistance in the investigation, apprehension and prosecution" of the people involved. Failure to do so would be a crime punishable by a mandatory minimum two-year prison sentence, and a maximum sentence of 10 years.

Here are some examples of offenses you would have to report to police within 24 hours:


You find out that your brother, who has children, recently bought a small amount of marijuana to share with his wife;
You discover that your son gave his college roommate a marijuana joint;
You learn that your daughter asked her boyfriend to find her some drugs, even though they're both in treatment.

In each of these cases you would have to report the relative to the police within 24 hours. Taking time to talk to your relative about treatment instead of calling the police immediately could land you in jail.

In addition to turning family member against family member, the legislation could also put many Americans in danger by forcing them to go undercover to gain evidence against strangers.

Even if the language that forces every American to become a de facto law enforcement agent is taken out, the bill would still impose draconian sentences on college students, mothers, people in drug treatment and others with substance abuse problems. If enacted, this bill will destroy lives, break up families, and waste millions of taxpayer dollars.

Despite growing opposition to mandatory minimum sentences from civil rights groups to U.S. Supreme Court Justices, the bill eliminates federal judges' ability to give sentences below the minimum recommended by federal sentencing guidelines. This creates a mandatory minimum sentence for all federal offenses, drug-related or not.

H.R. 1528 also establishes new draconian penalties for a variety of non-violent drug offenses, including:


Five years for anyone who passes a marijuana joint at a party to someone who, at some point in his or her life, has been in drug treatment;
Ten years for mothers with substance abuse problems who commit certain drug offenses at home (even if their children are not at home at the time);
Five years for any person with substance abuse problems who begs a friend in drug treatment to find them some drugs.

These sentences would put non-violent drug offenders behind bars for as long as rapists, and they include none of the drug treatment touted in the bill's name.

At a time when everyone from the conservative American Enterprise Institute to the liberal Sentencing Project is slamming the war on drugs as an abject failure, Sensenbrenner is trying to escalate it, and to force all Americans to become its foot soldiers. Instead of enacting new mandatory minimums, federal policymakers should look toward the states. A growing number have reformed their drug sentencing laws, including Arizona, California, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, New Mexico, New York and Texas, and they have proved it is possible to both save money and improve public safety.

Simply put, there is no way H.R. 1528 can be fixed. The only policy proposal in recent years that comes close to being as totalitarian as this bill is Operations TIPS, the Ashcroft initiative that would have encouraged -- but not required -- citizens to spy on one another. Congress rightfully rejected that initiative and they should do the same with H.R. 1528. Big Brother has no business here in America.


http://www.alternet.org/story/22048







Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Monday, May 23, 2005 7:57 AM on j-body.org
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/space_war_020515-1.html

Bush May Give Pentagon
OK To Weaponize Space
5-20-5

The new space policy in the United States might see President George W Bush allow the Pentagon greater authority to deploy space-based weapons, media reports have quoted sources in administration and defence experts as saying. According to reports, the new policy, being jointly drafted by the Defence Department, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and others, might see the proliferation of offensive weapons in space.

Issued by former US president Bill Clinton in 1996, the policy first aimed at using satellites for defensive purposes like keeping an eye on disarmament pacts and environmental cleanups. But security officials showed concerns about the chances of military and global communications satellites being attacked by enemy nations and said that with more nations launching satellites, the development of space weapons might not be far behind.

But industry watchers have warned such a move by United States might actually result in an arms race with China, Russia, and other countries. According to sources, the US already possesses the blueprints for space-based weapon systems and if such a policy comes through, the creation of such weapons might take as little as 18 months. Space weapons include small satellites attacking other satellites, and laser and radio waves weapons as also small planes that drop destructive material on ground targets.

"It certainly has the potential to be a significant moment if the US embraces a policy that advocates space weapons. That contributes to other states being interested," warned said Karl Mueller, a defence policy analyst at Rand Corp, a firm handling research for the government.

His contentions are echoed by Theresa Hitchens, president, Center for Defense Information. "I fear it is going to change the direction of US space policy that has been steady since Eisenhower was president. Up to now, this has been a campaign by the Air Force to have the freedom to do what they want to do in space. This will, for the first time in US history, give them the go-ahead," she said, adding, "Let's think of a world where US has 'death stars' everywhere in space that are going over countries every 10 minutes. Do you think other countries are going to accept that?"

However, the White House has denied trying to 'weaponize space'. "Let me make that clear right off the top, because you asked about the weaponization of space, and the policy that we're talking about is not looking at weaponizing space," said Scott McClellan, President Bush's media secretary.

However, he added, "Certainly during the last eight or nine years, there have been a number of domestic and international developments that have changed the threats and challenges facing our space capabilities. There are countries that have taken an interest in space. They have looked at technologies that could threaten our space systems and so you obviously need to take that into account when you,re updating the policy." McClellan said that the US believed in 'the peaceful exploration of space'.


---------


http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3b1030dc-c804-11d9-9765-00000e2511c8.html

Russia urges US to avoid space arms race
By Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington
Published: May 19 2005 03:00 | Last updated: May 19 2005 03:00

Russia would consider using force if necessary to respond if the US put a combat weapon into space, according to a senior Russian official.

According to a New York Times report yesterday, the Bush administration was moving towards implementing a new space policy that would move the US closer to placing offensive and defensive weapons in space. Russia, China and many US allies oppose any weaponisation of space, partly out of concerns that it would lead to an extremely expensive post-cold war arms race.






Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Tuesday, May 24, 2005 9:06 AM on j-body.org
Bush going back on long held ideals in the name of combatting terrorism is not surprising.

Weaponising space is a stupid idea.. not for the fact that it WILL bankrupt the US (hell, the missile defence shield isn't going to happen), but you're going to get China and Russia and Britain and France... well, every Nuclear nation involved... how many times do you have to cook everyone? seriously?!

Interesting point about Patriot act: (Mr GTO, pay attention here) Have you noticed that when someone says: Read the actual text of the bill, they haven't read the associated legislations as well? Took me about 4 hours of reading before I realised that most people won't go through it without giving up because it addresses about 100 year's worth of jurisprudence and laws. The interesting part is the "Sneak & Peak" and informational allowances. Any LEO in the USA is allowed by law to break into your house, look around, take whatever information (only) they need, and leave without it ever declaring it had entered... I'll post the section if I need to, I don't have it at work. It's funny, normally you'd need a judge to sign off on a regular warrant, but these are almost never declined, because the information is not usable in court, so it's okay right?

If you give up your privacy, you give up your freedom. You're not embroilled in a defensive war, yet you believe you are, and you let the guy that's already quadrupled your debt, and quintupled your defecits in for another 4 years.

Sad.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:47 AM on j-body.org
Again...

Ein Volk
Ein Reich
Ein Furer


Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Re: Bush... stupid or retarded....
Tuesday, May 24, 2005 2:25 PM on j-body.org
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength?

Big Brother is watching you.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search