pro evolutionists - Politics and War Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:08 AM on j-body.org
was just wondering if one of you would show me an example of a pre(modern) human?

Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:13 AM on j-body.org
What?





---- Limited Edition 2004 C5 with Double Blonde Accessory Package. ----
LS1Tech | F-Body.com | Eastern F-Body Association | Toronto F-Body Club
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:29 AM on j-body.org



---


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:44 AM on j-body.org
i would like a link and picture of the evolutionary step proceeding current modern humans
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:46 AM on j-body.org
Bonus points for Agustin


Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:28 AM on j-body.org
Pretjah wrote:i would like a link and picture of the evolutionary step proceeding current modern humans


Why?


---


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:31 AM on j-body.org
cause i've never seen one but hear about pre historic humans all the time
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:45 AM on j-body.org
...so...?

Really man... you are gonna have to connect the dots for us here... becasue though I am sure what you are trying to say makes sense in your head, we have no idea what you are trying to point out.





---- Limited Edition 2004 C5 with Double Blonde Accessory Package. ----
LS1Tech | F-Body.com | Eastern F-Body Association | Toronto F-Body Club
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:18 PM on j-body.org
i'm not pointing out anything. i'm asking a question....i would like a pro evolutionists,...heck anyone....to show me a picture of the actual remains of a prehistoric human.
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:23 PM on j-body.org
Oh, ok.

I'm not an evolutionist so I'm bailing.





---- Limited Edition 2004 C5 with Double Blonde Accessory Package. ----
LS1Tech | F-Body.com | Eastern F-Body Association | Toronto F-Body Club
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:28 PM on j-body.org







---



Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:29 PM on j-body.org
VOILA!!!


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:31 PM on j-body.org
THere is tons of prehistoric skulls found all over the world, we werent just put here overnight by some God event

I find it funny that those that are Jesus freaks never have ANY evidence to back up thier claims cept a 2000 year old book wrote by ppl who still thought the world was flat and the wheel was mankinds greatest invention. Science on the other hand has nothing but proof



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85





Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:35 PM on j-body.org
okay lol at rodimus atleast augustin tried.


thanks for that too
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:11 PM on j-body.org
Pretjah: you're asking us to prove something that has no solid evidence yet. I think that's why it's called a missing link

Isn't there a quote about a fools game trying to prove a negative?

Until there is solid evidence (ie. the exact spot where there was a break from simian to human specie), you're asking someone to turn a theory into a law.

I doubt that anyone on the Org is qualified to do or disprove that.

Agustin (spelling!) has brought up australo-pithicus afirencis, and the off-shoots, as well as cromagnons. I remember you pointing at another study that pointed at the finding of a quasi-modern homo-sapien, but there was no carbon dating (there was stratification dating, but that is notorious for being incorrect because of plate upheaval) as of publication.

I'm pretty sure I've read something about that find in Scientific American, or Popular Science, but I'm not entirely certain.

That would be the closest to a pre-modern or evolutionary step human I can think of off hand, assuming we're dealing with the idea that modern homo-sapien turned up as a genus/species about 60,000 years ago.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:23 PM on j-body.org
Rodimus Prime wrote:THere is tons of prehistoric skulls found all over the world, we werent just put here overnight by some God event

I find it funny that those that are Jesus freaks never have ANY evidence to back up thier claims cept a 2000 year old book wrote by ppl who still thought the world was flat and the wheel was mankinds greatest invention. Science on the other hand has nothing but proof


Preach on BROTHA!

<img src=http://laweekly.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/hobbits_4.jpg>






Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 3:56 PM on j-body.org

Quote:

i would like a link and picture of the evolutionary step proceeding current modern humans

Quote:

was just wondering if one of you would show me an example of a pre(modern) human?

hate to break it to ya but there weren't cameras millions of years ago... will bones do? lol




Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:01 PM on j-body.org
Neanderthal and H. sapiens
<img src="http://www.spectroscopynow.com/ftp_images/SL45-neanderthal_skeleton.jpg">
Homo erectus
<img src="http://pharyngula.org/images/erectus_skulls_lg.jpg">
Australopithecus
<img src="http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Evolution/Hominids/Australopithecus%20robustus.gif">
Hominid skull comparison
<img src="http://www.scientific-art.com/GIF%20files/Palaeontological/skulls.GIF">




Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:34 PM on j-body.org
Quote:

i would like a link and picture of the evolutionary step proceeding current modern humans

Quote:

was just wondering if one of you would show me an example of a pre(modern) human?


well, not to nitpick... but there are some serious tense issues here.




Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:19 PM on j-body.org
mmmh gam i'm not asking for missing links..i'm just asking for pics of full skeletons of heck even full skulls of humans dating more than 160,000 years ago
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:19 PM on j-body.org
or what theybelieve humans evolved out of that are more than 160,000 years old.

Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:15 PM on j-body.org
Over 160,000 years will be a goodly bit diffuclt... as late as 50,000 years ago there was an Ice Age, and that would pretty much negate finding intact skeletons.. and as I said I think earliest we see Austrailopithicus-aferencis (sp?) is 60,000 years ago.. and that's about as close as we have.

it's entirely possible there is another backward step to evolution, but Lucy is about as close as you can get to simian/human links... I forget the exact back-dating of the skeleton.



Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.


Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:29 PM on j-body.org
"Until there is solid evidence (ie. the exact spot where there was a break from simian to human specie), you're asking someone to turn a theory into a law. "

GAM called it a theory. Even scentists who believe in the religion of evolution, are forced to admit that it is a theory.

For any of you that would like to make some money, go to this website:

www.drdino.com

I think Dr. Hagen (sp) is still offering a substantial reward for anyone able to offer proof of evolution.

Btw, he will destroy any argument that you can come up with. He doesn't ask you to attack the Bible, or Christianity. He doesn't ask you to compare which makes more sense...just prove YOUR case.

He's participated in creation vs. evolution debates all over this country, and never lost.

Sadly, like many Christians, the followers of the religion of evolution do not know why they disagree with opposing viewpoints. So, naturally, I do not expect many of you followers to even view the site. It is much easier to not have to examine why you believe what you believe.

.


“Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very Internet you invented. Oh, oh, the irony!” -Jon Stewart
Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:17 PM on j-body.org
"He's participated in creation vs. evolution debates all over this country, and never lost."

He may have never lost, but I guarantee he's never won either.

BTW, evolution isn't a religion.



Re: pro evolutionists
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:04 PM on j-body.org
Gonna get a little off topic here but has there ever been a discussion about how god came to be? Big Bang theories get shot down by some creationists because they believe that something cannot come from nothing. Basically all I'm saying is that what or who made god? If you can't believe that the universe came from nothing in the first place then how could a god come to be if there was nothing there to begin with?
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search