I didn't even bother reading past #1 before hitting "Quote" because I knew this would be easy.
kidduntradishunal wrote:I am not openly attacking any one particular group, but the whole entire picture regarding the human race and their devout attactchment to religion. I just don't understand the logic behind all of it.
1. Perhaps if such strong ties to these beliefs were never in place, money spent and resources used to create facilities, operate such facilities and support it's cause could be diverted to other needs. Property used for other purposes. Manpower available for other neccessities of civilization. Advancement of society.
The reason mankind has advanced at all is because of organization. Religion has been the basis of many governments, and has also been the counter-check to many others.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
2. If life lessons, morals and other life teachings were never tied to religion, there would be far less hostility between different ethnics of people. Being a good person has NOTHING to do with what religion you reside your faith in, it's about knowing right from wrong. Being humane and honest.
That's real easy to say today, but the 10 Commandmens and their equivalents have been a pretty decent moral foundation for many for a good long time. It's a good foundation to build a person around. Knowing the 10 Commandments, however, doesn't make you a good person no more than knowing the Bill of Rights makes you a good politician.
I'm not really sure how you tie religion in general to hostilities between ethnic people. Bad people can distory anything, government or religion, to their purpose, and bad people are the ones to blame.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
3. Biggest cause of war since the stoneage? Difference in beliefs. Religion has caused more wars in the history of the human race then any other issue.
I'm getting real tired of hearing this. And how many good deeds have been done in the name of religion? How many lives saved, people fed, diseases treated, monies donated, children educated because of religion? It's become awfully easy to overlook the good deeds of Christianity and Islam these days when it's convenient.
My church ALONE this year does this... food giveaway every week, feeds the homeless in at their "tent city", funds inner-city after school programs that school district can't afford, free summer camps, free drug and alcohol addiction treatment, a
foster care agency, turkey giveaway at Thanksgiving, going to the jail and trying to right some inmates, and last year donated over 25,000 toys to children!
And they do this with a congregation that ITSELF is below the poverty line, mostly because they have nearly no administration costs because everybody donates time. The only paid employee in any of the above is one lady in the foster care agency. And I'm glad I can say I'm apart of it all.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
4. Instead of the many centuries of religious teachings and such that took place we could have advanced hard sciences like mathematics, biology, chemistry and physics. Also, people who were at the forefront of advancing these fields were marked by the church as deviants, evil people. Absurd.
There are a few popular stories that support your statement, when taken in passing, but the truth is much more complex. The Mayans, Incas and Egyptions largely used their religion to support their science. And early Christians kept literacy alive after the fall of the Roman empire, and used science to debunk superstitions that not only conflicted with Christianity, but also reasoning and logic. It doesnt take much effort to see that religion and science are NOT mutually exclusive concepts.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
5. You think political leaders are power mongrols? No different then the respected leaders of all major religions. It's politics with a bible. The more power a certain faith has, the more influence it's ideals are. That, and it plays back into normal politics.
Nothing like stating the obvious.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
6. Many, MANY people live lives directly or undirectly to better their supposed afterlife. They make sacrafices, tolerances and exceptions to try to benefit this. They sometimes give up things they love. For the purpose of something that can NEVER be proven, only theorized about. There is no do-good bank account you can cash in once you kick the bucket.
You made an affirmative statement at the end there that not only shows your ignorance of the Bible, but contradicts your "can't prove" assertion earlier in the same paragraph. Absence of evidence is not proof to the contrary. As far as the "do-good" bank account goes, that's not how it works. And I'm not going to be your Sunday School teacher today, so you'll have to look it up.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
7. Gods and other beyond-human attributes were given to things in nature that could not be explained at the time, or feared. God for thunder. God for the rivers, lakes and oceans. God for creation. God for punishment. We've come a very long way since those days, more and more understanding of our world everyday. The world is round, we're not the centre of the universe and if you 'sin' you will not be smited out of exsistance.
You're meshing a lot of different beliefs from a lot of different time periods into one statement of ridiculousness that isn't worth a whole lot to the thread.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
6. Personal experience: Friend of my fathers, son, Mike was severely unstable. Suffered from bad bouts of depression. The father was of the oldschool, logical and straightforward. The son sometimes didn't get along with the father. One night he stayed overnight at his mother's sisters apartment. His mother, on the other hand was a born-again Christian (doesn't matter what religion, just an example in this case). She told him God will save him. Medicine is wrong. God takes care of his children. Well, so much for such beliefs. He went into the bedroom and onto the balcony. He leaped off the 19th story. Where is God now? The medication was helping him. He stopped taking it under his mother's advice. His mother's insane claims did nothing to help.
Ah, I get it. You have a personal experience and you're going to allow a nutjob to represent everyone else. Good job. I have a non-personal experience. Mother Teresa ran medical clinics for orphans that had real medicine. Chew on that concept.
kidduntradishunal wrote:
You put it down on paper. You measure it. You try to prove the benefit of otherwordly teachings. A place up above. You can't. It's personal and I respect that, but I don't respect the effects it has on the human race.
That's because you see only what you want to see. You've clearly turned this into a black and white issue in your mind.
A topic of such history, such variation, deserves better than your statement for an impossible number of reasons.
I suggest you visit a large variety of your local religion institutions, shake some hands and judge for yourself.
You'll find some crazies, but I bet you'll find a lot more people asking for a hand during their next outreach.
---