Weebel wrote:Why the hell do we even have a damn constitution or bill of rights if you dont follow it..... I thought we HAD to follow it and we dont have a choice..... their the supreme law of our country.... how in the hell do we get away with not following it?You don't have to be a lawyer to understand that different people interpret things differently. How many different religious denominations are there after all?
I dont freaking understand this...... these people in our government should be tired for criminal acts against the United States the first second they break any of these laws..... WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:lolQuote:
In honor of the 44th President of the United States, Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has issued a new flavor, "Barocky Road". Barocky Road is a blend of half Vanilla, half Chocolate, and surrounded by Nuts and Flakes. The Vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised and usually denied as an ingredient. The Nuts and Flakes are all very bitter and hard to swallow. The cost is $100.00 per scoop. When purchased it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone, but then the Ice Cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you. Thus you are left with an empty Wallet, no change, holding an empty cone, with no hope of getting any Ice Cream. Aren't you feeling stimulated?
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
No.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
Weebel wrote:But we arnt keeping the government in check like we are supposed to.... where letting them run rampit doing whatever they want.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
No.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
No, That is around to keep government in cheek.
Do you know why Lexington and Concord were Fighting the red coats over?
Chris
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
[b]Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
Jay T wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
[b]Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
At least spell the constitution right! Bush enacted that 1 month after 9/11 , He could have sold everyone real estate on mars at that time. Since your Messiah is in the house maybe you should have him destroy the patriot act? Oh that's right he is worse than Bush x100.
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Jay T wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
[b]Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
At least spell the constitution right! Bush enacted that 1 month after 9/11 , He could have sold everyone real estate on mars at that time. Since your Messiah is in the house maybe you should have him destroy the patriot act? Oh that's right he is worse than Bush x100.
Yes, because by doing a typo and bringing it to light, makes it so important. "This is serious buisness," especially on a message board.
But next time, before you go and do your greatest impression of "pot meet kettle," proof read your own $hit.
I have nothing to hide, but I say the Patriot Act is utter crap and gives a false sense of security, especiall when it was made for it's original intended purpose. And I could not agree more on Bush's power after 9/11.
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
No.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
No, That is around to keep government in cheek.
Do you know why Lexington and Concord were Fighting the red coats over?
Chris
Yep.
Now the question is; are you going to practice what you preach err... what you interpret or are you still going to walk on your knees and hope somebody does it for you?
All I can say is, when it comes to your train of thought, I'm glad you're a minority.
Jay T wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Jay T wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
[b]Were you defending the constitutiong during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
At least spell the constitution right! Bush enacted that 1 month after 9/11 , He could have sold everyone real estate on mars at that time. Since your Messiah is in the house maybe you should have him destroy the patriot act? Oh that's right he is worse than Bush x100.
Yes, because by doing a typo and bringing it to light, makes it so important. "This is serious business," especially on a message board.
But next time, before you go and do your greatest impression of "pot meet kettle," proof read your own $hit.
I have nothing to hide, but I say the Patriot Act is utter crap and gives a false sense of security, especially when it was made for it's original intended purpose. And I could not agree more on Bush's power after 9/11.
Hmmmm My spell checker works fine thanks. So why wont the great messiah get rid of the patriot act? Probably cause he likes it and will never get rid of it and will probably add to it. Obamanation is a complete idiot and even worse is the morons on the hill. That's ok, now that they have control of the senate, house and presidency they can not blame anyone except them selves. Thank god for 2010 and 2012, just wish it was sooner!
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Taetsch Z-24 wrote:That’s because none of you ever swear to defend the Constitution.
Am I wrong?
To me it’s black and white.
If it’s not in the Constitution, we should not do it.
Were you defending the constitution during the "Patriot Act" or did you just walk on your knees?
No.
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:Oh, IDN, the second amendment is pretty black and white..
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Quote:
INFRINGED
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another 2obsolete : defeat, frustrate
Kinda almost sounds like a lot of out gun "laws" could be considered unconstitutional.....
Chris
Yhea, it's there if our own military fails on us and in order to prevent some other's country flag to be propped up as a defeat.... Hence; American Revolutionary War.
No, That is around to keep government in cheek.
Do you know why Lexington and Concord were Fighting the red coats over?
Chris
Yep.
Now the question is; are you going to practice what you preach err... what you interpret or are you still going to walk on your knees and hope somebody does it for you?
All I can say is, when it comes to your train of thought, I'm glad you're a minority.
Then tell me.
Tell me why that first shot was fired.
Chris
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:I would\will stand up for my rights, or die trying, as they did.
Chris
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:I would\will stand up for my rights, or die trying, as they did.
Chris
Weebel wrote:So what goodwrench is saying is that people are pussies...... I agree with that.....
AND THATS THE DAMN PROBLEM
well besides them being stupid as well...
The small number of us that would actually go "well its started" grab our guns and head into our own war for freedom...... are so significantly out numbered by stupid pussies that our efforts would be moot..... but we would still fight none the less.