either if you have the 94035, the 94105, or some other combination, what is the relative height size to it in comparison to the stocker? is there room to tuck it up under the car a little more? i currently have the stock cat on my car, and i rub it every now and then on damn inclines and stuff, gotta love a drop
i was just curious to know if the mag cats are a better fit and can be tucked a little more (if needed) so they dont scrape as much as the big round stock cat.
opinions and info?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sold my beloved J in April 2010 -
I'm not sure of the part number, but i have a universal high flow magnaflow, its a small one, about half the size of the stock cat. It's 2 1/4" in and 2 1/4" out, i also have a full aftermarket exhaust to.
Its tucked up nice in the body
I have one. Its roughly half to 2/3 the stock width and about half in length.
____________________________________________________________________
Madjack wrote:Like I said before, building an engine like ours (2.2 or 2200) is a painstaking chore , since there is so few custom made parts. It's frustrating to me too, but that's what I like about doing this engine, it's the challenge.
I have the 94035 which is a lot bigger than the stock one, the problem with the stock one is not its size tho more so the shape, its round. So mine is bigger and fits better than stock.
2012 HD VRSCF
2010 Ford Explorer
2006 Ford Ranger
2004 Chevy Cavalier
so essentially, its not as low to the ground right
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sold my beloved J in April 2010 -
Mines 94??? something or another been on 2 weeks now no codes and no problems
( knock on wood )
Its a 2 1/2 inch pipe tho.
Semper Fi SAINT. May you rest in peace.
My 53005 isn't much larger around than the stock cat. I have no problems with mine hitting the ground, the only part of my catback that is prone to scraping and does most of the time is the section right in front of the rear axle.
I was a retard, and now I'm permanently banned.
i have a longer then usual magnaflow/carsound cat on my car. its was cheaper
MY 2003 SUNFIRE 15.6@86mph
"A N/A ecotec is not gonna give Honda's and Mitsu's that much of a run for their
money unless their blown or bottle fed.GM is still smokin crack!"
~1QWKZ24
www.streetracing.org, 08/2001
Hey hows it going?. I have been reading all of u that has this cat say it fits real good. I got mine in today, took it to the muffler shop and he said it wont fit. He said something about it rattling against the body and not haveing enough room for the O2 sensor to screw in. Has any one else been told this.. or can tell me if its just a line of bs... Any comments or tips would be appreciated..thanks for the time
Its a tight fit for the body but it will fit and not rub, go somewhere else.
2012 HD VRSCF
2010 Ford Explorer
2006 Ford Ranger
2004 Chevy Cavalier
I just finished installing my 2.5" turbo back exhaust.. I used a magnaflow 94066 (two sensor bungs) with 2 oxygen sensors plugged in and they both fit ok. If you're looking at the front of the car, I have the cat tilted a bit clockwise to give a little big extra room for the sensors (which are on the driver side of the cat -- see pictures for what I mean). I also don't have it tucked all the way up under the car, and its fine so far.
Viper98912 wrote:either if you have the 94035, the 94105, or some other combination, what is the relative height size to it in comparison to the stocker? is there room to tuck it up under the car a little more? i currently have the stock cat on my car, and i rub it every now and then on damn inclines and stuff, gotta love a drop
i was just curious to know if the mag cats are a better fit and can be tucked a little more (if needed) so they dont scrape as much as the big round stock cat.
opinions and info?
94035 is flat, slightly longer than stock, and can be tucked a bit. more ground clearance as well.
the one i used to have, 91035, was shorter, and for some will throw codes as its not as efficient as the 94035, which has more catalyst material to burn away more crap...
the more crap you burn away, the less chance or throwing a code, the lesser a need for 02 sims and other things that can mess up the balance of actual readings.
i fit the 94035 under there WITH a 30 inch resonator and now upgraded to a 31 inch resonator....
so fitment shouldnt be an issue for anyshop with the basic skills to install
k, thanks for the info im going back tomarrow after i get off of work if he still says he cant get it to fit ill take my business elswhere. Thanks for the help and time..
pics of mine, magnaflow 59006
14.82 @ 97 mph
