How good/bad are the 2.4L twin cam engines(compared to the quad4 and 2.8/3.1)??? - Maintenance and Repair Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
How good/bad are the 2.4L twin cam engines(compared to the quad4 and 2.8/3.1)???
Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:54 AM
I just bought a 97 sunfire gt with a 2.4l twin cam w/automatic tranny. Now i was wondering compared to 3.1/2.8 v6 engines how good or bad are they for breaking down and haveing problems. I also use to own a grand am with the older 2.3L quad 4 ho engine and i hated it i sunk more cash into fixing that engine in one yr then i spent on some cars in 10. I will never own a 2.3l twin cam ever again,,,but how good are the 2.4 twin are they also bad....should i get rid of the sunfire....im kinda scared after my 1st experiance with the 2.3l. Ive also has a 2.8 and 3.1 cars and they work great imo.

Re: How good/bad are the 2.4L twin cam engines(compared to the quad4 and 2.8/3.1)???
Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:22 PM
As reliable as any 2.3 except the SOHC. Reliability is greatly affected by the owner.



Gilles
2.3 Ho

Re: How good/bad are the 2.4L twin cam engines(compared to the quad4 and 2.8/3.1)???
Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:35 PM
There are 2 2.4 in my family, my '99 and my husband's '01. We haven't had a single problem with either, the '99 has about 90,000 miles and the '01 has about 110,000 miles. We're on top of maintenance & don't constantly tinker with things.




Re: How good/bad are the 2.4L twin cam engines(compared to the quad4 and 2.8/3.1)???
Friday, January 25, 2008 3:59 AM
^^ like mentioned if you keep up on maintenance your car will be good. its just like any other motor. just take care of it and it will last you.



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search