last whinter i ave rebuile my ld9 whit

-jbp stage 2 cam
-jbp valve spring
-jbp lock and reteaner
-jbp valve int
-jbp valve exh
-custom head port and polish 0.01
-cometic 0.03 head gasket
-wisco piston 9.5@1
-eagle connecting rod
-cranck polish and balanc
-acl all bearing
-arp all bolt
-t/b 62mm
-440cc
-all motor mouth eurethane
- full exhaust
-header
-hpt
-holly fuel pump
-

I ave 2.3 intack port. but this intake is best ????

No hell no. So you are asking about intake manifolds, and not intakes.



FU Tuning

ok this intake flow no more
this intake is the best ???

Still the LO intake.

I have the HO version perfectly port matched if interested.

-M


Remember....syringes go in the RED waste basket.

i don't see the point of the HO verse LO manifold

the only difference is the body size but still more then enough air movement i would like to see dyno numbers of both bet its not even 1hp


JBO since July 30, 2001

I would like to see the OP take an english class....

EVOFire (DesertTuners) wrote:I would like to see the OP take an english class....

I will guess that he is French Canadian....they lack in the english department because they don't want to assimilate into the English speaking world for they fear they will lose their culture...hence why us Canadians constantly deal with them wanting to seperate into their own country....thats just my rant...now onto the topic at hand...from what I have read on this site, the HO and LO mani's make little difference but then it all comes down to supporting mods...

There is no proof that the 2.3 intake manifolds flow better than a stock 2.4 intake manifold. There is one dyno showing a HP loss with the 2.3 manifold. That is only one.



FU Tuning

sounds mexican to me.....but then again, i'm just used to French Canadians who can't speak very well..... but MAN, do those mexicans catch me off guard.

either way, the org has spell check....lol