no. too small.

Familiar Taste of Poison.
u can use 2.4 locks... but not retainers.

Familiar Taste of Poison.
we might as well continue this one in AJ's thread, I was asking for him, but he didn't see my question I guess.
well i know for a fact now that the HO cams will not fit the 33mm bores. so sometime soon im taking my junkyard intake tower and getting it bored for 35mm lifters. im really feeling like a newb right know because it seems im doin stuff thats been tried or done years ago. i dont believe nothing until i see it. before i do anymore motor work im getting a wideband.
You could clearance the tower so the cam could spin, you have once the towers are bored to 35mm...
I just picked up an exhaust cam tower off a 1990 grand am today and I just measured the lifter opening and it appears to be 35mm. Do all the pre-95 2.3's have 35mm lifters? I left the lifters/cam in the car and am wondering if I should have picked them up to.
I believe all 2.3 motors had the 35mm lifters..... I THINK, no 100 on that though.
Also, I suggest NEW lifters whichever route you go.
~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
was told the 95 2.3 has 33mm lifters...pre-95 2.3's have the 35mm lifters
^^Could be right.
~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
95's are 33mm if i remember correctly.
Hell I think 95's RPO code is LG0.......no one knows why.
PRND321 Till I DIE
Old Motor: 160whp & 152ft/lbs, 1/4 Mile 15.4 @88.2
M45 + LD9 + 4T40-E, GO GO GO
those lifters < 60 year old hooker.
95 2.3s DO have the smaller 33mm lifters as well as the smaller diameter lobes on the cams.
basically a good way to describe a 95 2.3 is a 2.4 with a different intake manifold and less displacement. pretty much it.

I must confess... I feel like a monster!