LAF 2.4 - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
LAF 2.4
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 4:36 PM


182 hp (136 kW) @ 6700 rpm (gasoline) 172 lb·ft (233 N·m) @ 4900 rpm (gasoline)

In a J? ...Possible?
..

thoughts?

I know anything is possible with money, but I'm curious if the LAF bolts on the same way. Noone has discussed this new motor, 182 hp is pretty significant.




Re: LAF 2.4
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 4:38 PM
it's direct injected and has vvt. do we really need to go any further? no, it won't be a direct bolt-in.



87 Firebird
All stock...........lol.
Re: LAF 2.4
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:09 PM
the wiring and computer will be a pita, especially since the only computer that can run it is the one from the car you pulled it from (megasquirt and all the other standalones cant do DI).


1994 Saturn SL2 Home Coming Edition: backup car
2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport Coupe: In a Junk Yard
1995 Mazda Miata R-package Class=STR
Sponsored by: Kronos Performance

WPI Class of '12 Mechanical Engineering
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Management Officer
Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 4:28 AM
The ONLY way you will get this to remotely work in a cav is to take the entire wiring harnes and ECU from the donor car, along with the fuel system provisions for the DI.

There is a thread going about using the gen 2 bottom ends, that is probably as good as it gets for us



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:22 AM
yeah, If one of these bolted up like the L61 i'de be hoping somebody totaled a car real fast, and lookin in yards like crazy, lol. These motors have 11 something compression! mmm.



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:25 AM
for the money you would have getting it to work you could build an L61 up for n/a and be at even power power.

ben wenzel squeezed 193whp out of his iirc



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:58 AM
Quote:

Noone has discussed this new motor, 182 hp is pretty significant.


significant? considering the quad4 made that much power 20 years ago....im not impressed



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:30 AM
and the quad 4 was n/a while the lap is turbo.


1994 Saturn SL2 Home Coming Edition: backup car
2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport Coupe: In a Junk Yard
1995 Mazda Miata R-package Class=STR
Sponsored by: Kronos Performance

WPI Class of '12 Mechanical Engineering
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Management Officer
Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:37 AM
scott (section8cav) wrote:
Quote:

Noone has discussed this new motor, 182 hp is pretty significant.


significant? considering the quad4 made that much power 20 years ago....im not impressed


Leafy wrote:and the quad 4 was n/a while the lap is turbo.

thank you!!! my originial thoughts here were to suggest to just a Quad motor in and call it a day!!



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:56 AM
oh, true. didnt think about the quad 4.

still looks like a nice engine!



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:42 AM
So much misinformation in this thread...

the LAF is the direct injected VVT 2.4 (predecessor is the LE5 - VVT 2.4)
the LAP is the VVT 2.2 (predecessor is the L61 - 2.2)
the LNF is the direct injected, turbo VVT 2.0 and the ONLY factory turbo in the bunch




Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:58 AM
.....well that sure changes things



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:05 AM
scott (section8cav) wrote:.....well that sure changes things
lol it doesn't change things. all those engines are impractical swaps in a jbody. the quad for is much more practical, effective and proven. It's been done before with good results



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:09 AM
So what cars to those engines come in? ^^










~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:12 AM
The LAF is the replacement for the LE5, so it will come in midsize sedans like the G6, small SUV's like the traverse ect. I'm not sure if it's out yet though.

The LAP replaced the L61, so think small cars like the cobalt and HHR

The LNF was available in the sky redline/solstice GXP, as well as the current cobalt ss/HHR ss. Rumored to be a possibility in the Cruze, but not likely. A detuned version may be available for the upcoming buick regal.



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:54 PM
Quote:

significant? considering the quad4 made that much power 20 years ago....im not impressed


Thats not a fair assessment, the 190hp Quad 4 had no low end. It was like an Iron Duke on the low end.

The new Ecotec has linear power from 0 to 115mph, more if the limiter is off.

Looking at the max output on both is not a fair comparison.




My wife's 2003 Ecotec 2.2 liter Sunfire:
* 2 1/4 inch in and dual 2 inch out muffler Trans Am muffler
* 2 1/4 piping to a very long 2 1/4 inch resonator
* 2 1/4 inch catalytic converter
* an AEM true cold air intake NOPI edition
* 8 gauge ground wire kit
* Toyz front strut brace
* Russell stainless steel brake lines all around.
Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:57 PM
the eco has linear power...the quad revs up much faster getting to its power band quickly and making up for any low end loss
...................check



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:59 PM
scott (section8cav) wrote:the eco has linear power...the quad revs up much faster getting to its power band quickly and making up for any low end loss
...................check
QFT



Re: LAF 2.4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:35 PM
linear power band vs peaky power band? .....I know which one I'd pick.

the LAF has 11.4:1 compression, looks like that'd be a nice addition if you hybridized it under an L61 head.. hows roughly 12:1 compression sound?


also, not that I really care about this, but the LAF got bumped up compression and VVT to probably run better in an atkinson cycle for fuel economy. what the did the quad 4 get MPG wise?


right.





Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:58 AM
Quote:

what the did the quad 4 get MPG wise?



sorry...MPG ? .. whats that? i dont think ive given mpg a second thought in like years lol

besides..dont try to get off subject
the comment made was that the 182hp 4banger factory motor was significant. ...and dont reuse the linear power band comment cus i already countered that one



Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:29 AM
yeah really...

who cares about mpg anyway? when you put the pedal through the floor im pretty sure gas mileage isnt even in you're thought pattern.

adrenaline > mpg's.






Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:32 AM
apparently we all cared at some point or else we wouldnt be driving fwd 4 cylinders.


1994 Saturn SL2 Home Coming Edition: backup car
2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport Coupe: In a Junk Yard
1995 Mazda Miata R-package Class=STR
Sponsored by: Kronos Performance

WPI Class of '12 Mechanical Engineering
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Management Officer
Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:40 AM
My buddies Calais 442 W41 gets 30 city and 40 highway. Not bad for a low technology car. Oh and even with a cracked cylinder head (he didnt know at the time) and an inexperienced drag racer it still pulled off a 14.6@96 his first time out with it.



Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:05 AM
I only worry about MPG in my daily driven beater










~2014 New Z under the knife, same heart different body~
______________________
WHITECAVY no more
2012 numbers - 4SPD AUTOMATIC!!
328 HP
306 TQ
Re: LAF 2.4
Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:21 AM
mitdr774 wrote:My buddies Calais 442 W41 gets 30 city and 40 highway.
I'm calling BS on those numbers, unless he somehow reduced the weight of the car by like a thousand pounds. 25/35 would be a liberal estimate...



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search