which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo - Third Generation Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:32 PM
alright, so i bought my first car, a 96 cavalier 2.2 five speed. as of today it has 109000 miles on it. ive been toying around with it a little bit, basically just got a k&n filter and a cherry bomb glasspack. and i am about to buy some coilovers, but i want to save up to get some more serious mods and i was wondering which is cheaper, and which is money better spent, going with a turbo or swapping a v6. thanks

Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 8:56 PM
A 3400 swap has easier power potential. But I'll let the LN2 owners say their peace.


-

"Youth in Asia"...I don't see anything wrong with that.
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:10 PM
for your application, 3400 would be mechanically easier due to limitations on the 96 2.2 fuel delivery system.









Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:31 PM
but if he is able to get the parts required, more power is to be gained then from a stock 3400. I must say though that US is lucky for having the 96 with OBDII cause it didn't start up here till 97 IIRC. I just got inside the OBDII stage where my friends 96 is still OBDI.



Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:53 PM
Quote:

but if he is able to get the parts required


for the injectors, he would need to do a top feed conversion since there are no other side feed injectors for the 95-97 2.2l engines.

The fuel pump flows plenty for the 3400.









Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:36 PM
You also have to take into account the wiring if i'm not mistaken.That is what always made me not want to do a v6 swap.

I don't have the pate nice to do that or the know how really.Feared that i would mess something up and blow the motor.
You could always send the wiring to painless wiring i believe,but i think they want your first born child for their price.





Rememeber kids... spell check is your friend
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:39 PM
hense the reason I said mechanically and not electronically.

Once I get things wired up the way I want, I plan on sending my hack-n-slice to Painless (if they can do it).









Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:44 PM
I looked into one day.Not extensively though... i assumed they would want something over 2k for a wiring job of the sort.





Rememeber kids... spell check is your friend
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 4:22 AM
v6. nuff said




coming back in 2008...
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 4:44 AM
I would go with the V6 swap, as you should be able to get all of the parts for less than a turbo kit for the 2.2, not to mention the need to do other mods.

However, the V6 swap presents plenty of challenges. Either way you go, change out your clutch.








Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 5:44 AM
why not an eco swap?


http://www.jbodytuner.com
^^ The real jbody store and forums!!!!!

Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 6:38 AM
Brad McLean wrote:but if he is able to get the parts required, more power is to be gained then from a stock 3400. I must say though that US is lucky for having the 96 with OBDII cause it didn't start up here till 97 IIRC. I just got inside the OBDII stage where my friends 96 is still OBDI.

Wrong, your friends 96 is OBD2. Its just a screwed up year for the J's in terms of the PCM, thats why HPT cant flash that year.


Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 9:57 AM
ODB 1.5

It's own little world, only used for 2-3 years.






Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 10:00 AM
^^^ I thought the 95' auto quad4 was the only engine in a cav to have OBD 1.5.


-

"Youth in Asia"...I don't see anything wrong with that.
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 11:19 AM
If I were him, I'd go with V6 swap as well. It's probably cheaper, and almost, if not all of the parts, can be bought at junkyards. Also, if he wants even more power down the road, he still has a stock V6 in it, which can make very nice numbers naturally aspirated.
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 1:06 PM
v6. the 2.2 puts out little power and the amount of money you have to spend to get the power and done correctly, your better of with the v6



Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 2:07 PM
what would the ballpark cost of a v6 swap be? if anyone has done a 3400 swap how much did you spend total?
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 3:34 PM
I am not a prime example for cheap and easy junkyard v6 swap. I have over 3 grand in mine, easy.
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 3:47 PM
depends on what all your going to do with it really, i also had the getrag swapped in at the same time.
i got everything for my car at once, spent between 5,000 and 6,000 on it all,

fidanza aluminum flywheel,
spec stg 3 clutch,
urethane upper and lower engine mounts
tranny mounts and urethane tranny bushings
urethane control arm bushings,
kyb agx's
eibach prokit,
engine,
getrag tranny,
shifter linkage and assembly(in the car),
exhaust,
wiring harness(thanks to raven and doubleZ),
fluids.
temp, tach, and volt gauge

plus labour if you don't plan on doing it yourself.

im probably missing something but thats probably pretty close. whether you go all out and take care of everything or just do as little as it takes to get it in there and drivable. make sure you have some spare cash put away because there will be bugs.

things ive had to deal with is i had a rad fan stop working and overheated.
blew a couple heater hoses
broke a boss on the oil pan from a lower mount bolt coming lose.(thread lock them)
blew tranny (fixing this in the spring, so thats as far as ive got.


there is a v6 progress thread in this section that has plenty of information i suggest you read it before you tackle the swap.
good luck on whichever way you decide to go






My 3400 Swap Page
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 4:12 PM
thanks for all the input and advice
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 4:16 PM
Alex Lazary wrote:what would the ballpark cost of a v6 swap be? if anyone has done a 3400 swap how much did you spend total?

It all depends on how much you are going to do/make yourself, and how much you can score the parts needed for.

For example, so far, I've spent:

engine $400
upper mount from 95 GA $50
ECM $25
wiring harnesses $75
exhaust downpipe parts $50
misc hoses (radiator, fuel, power steering, heater) $100
clutch $200
alternator $30
PS pump $15
AC comp $50
AC lines $20
EGR valve $20 (needed unit from 95 3100)

Do the math...just over a grand. However, as you can see above, it can be done for a hell of a lot more. I also made some custom parts that would run you a couple of hundred bucks to have made.







Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 5:46 PM
Mine:

Engine - 1200
Harness 1 @ 50, 1 @ 75
PCM: 2 @ 100 (first was not working right)
BCM: 40
Gauges: 500 or so
Mount: 40

plus a bunch of extra stuff (belt drive acc, new bushings, etc)... total about $3k









Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 6:33 PM
No offense and I know the OP has a 2.2 but $3k into a Eco or Ld9>V-6 swap anyday



15.2@89mph 2.171 60ft. 9.830 1/8 R.I.P. "LULU"
Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 7:46 PM
Brad McLean wrote:but if he is able to get the parts required, more power is to be gained then from a stock 3400. I must say though that US is lucky for having the 96 with OBDII cause it didn't start up here till 97 IIRC. I just got inside the OBDII stage where my friends 96 is still OBDI.


I don't know about us guys with 3rd gens, I especially know that i've not hit the dyno. But I do know that guys with 2nd Gen cars and 3400's can easily hit 190+whp. I challenge you to build a 96 2.2 car to reliably put down that much power without destroying itself on the stock bottom end. Note with history that very rarely or ever will a 2.2OHV put down that much power without taking a big chunk out of a piston above the top ring land.





Re: which is money better spent: v6 swap or turbo
Friday, January 04, 2008 7:56 PM
Kardain wrote:
Quote:

but if he is able to get the parts required


for the injectors, he would need to do a top feed conversion since there are no other side feed injectors for the 95-97 2.2l engines.

The fuel pump flows plenty for the 3400.


I know how that can be as I've been looking myself, found one set but the asking price was insanely rediculous.

Sorry, I can't seem to spell when I'm tired, lol.



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search