EvoFire wrote:BuiltNBoosted wrote:blackbirdracing wrote:EvoFire wrote:to bad we dont have a built and non built options. i think 13.9 on a stock motor boosted stock trans should be something to let people see. and its got more in it to. just my opinion.
I ran a 12.8 on a stock motor, boosted stock trans... Lol...
i did as well.
and thats fine, but there is a limit to a non built motor. so i think it would be cool to let people see what can be done without building a motor. then let people see what can be done with a built motor. just my opinion......
colt45 wrote:Brad (flatblackfire) wrote:z yaaaa wrote:how does everyone feel about elevations and possibly track names added into the list?
i know it would be a bitch to figure it all out but i think its worth it to know as elevation can play a big factor in times. its no different than adding in what dyno was used in the whp thread...
makes a lot of sense actually. With my time that I currently have up, I was at a much higher elevation than my last time that was 0.5 seconds slower. Edmonton, Alberta compared to St. Thomas, Ontario. Quite the difference in elevation there...
Found something that may be kind of interesting, I know elevation can wreak havoc on 1/4 times, so what if a conversion calculator like this one was used to create an even playing field? Click me to convert
I know from talking to a few people at the local track that it is the slowest they race at. Cars run consistently 1.2-1.5 seconds slower than anywhere else. Just a suggestion.
Transporter7220 wrote:I just realized I actually qualify for the NA quad list, haha
Timothy Norton (Transporter7220), 15.324 @ 88.95 - NA, Purebred, Street Tires, 5 speed
Sorry Brad and Mike, hopefully I'll be mid 14's soon
colt45 wrote:Colton (colt45) firstname.lastname@example.org- N/A, auto
Switched from the steelies I was running to a set of 89 14'' Z24 rims with better tires
Cavi2Sunfire wrote:i vote keep it as is i always looked at it as a competition and an accomplishment to get onto the top faster cars list.
colt45 wrote:Keep it like it is, but maybe have any important info listed with the time (ie: transmission, tires, type of induction, etc.)
-Z Yaaaa- wrote:12.9 N/A with an LN2?
EvoFire wrote:i think stock vs. built should be seperated
-Z Yaaaa- wrote:12.9 N/A with an LN2?damn.. really? Brad... i think reading > you... lol ...I wrote that in the official thread as an example as to how to post up submissions... (except i added how to link the profile and the slip in to the format)
Mystic02VA (GME Chat) wrote:-Z Yaaaa- wrote:12.9 N/A with an LN2?damn.. really? Brad... i think reading > you... lol ...I wrote that in the official thread as an example as to how to post up submissions... (except i added how to link the profile and the slip in to the format)