Knoxfire Esquire wrote:The Obama administration's dealing of the Automobile and Housing crisis are so hideously wrongheaded that I don't even know what to say anymore.
They're trying to fix the housing crash by not lowering the price of houses, which is what triggered the crash in the first place.
They're trying to fix the automobile crisis by not forcing unions to renegotiate their salaries, which is one of the major problems.
They're trying to form a greener America where it's more expensive to live, in the middle of a recession when people have no money.
I've given a LOT of crap to Bush, called him "The Idiot in Chimp" actually, and I stand by every complaint I made. However, the Obama administration is shaping up to be just as bad.
One of Bush's biggest problems is that he was crap at speeches. Obama doesn't have that problem. Everything else though? Kee-rist. He might as well be the lovechild of Jimmy Carter and George Bush. All the bleeding heart, all the bad ideas, twice the stupidity.
You guys are so damn screwed.
Knoxfire Esquire wrote:The Obama administration's dealing of the Automobile and Housing crisis are so hideously wrongheaded that I don't even know what to say anymore.
They're trying to fix the housing crash by not lowering the price of houses, which is what triggered the crash in the first place.
They're trying to fix the automobile crisis by not forcing unions to renegotiate their salaries, which is one of the major problems.
They're trying to form a greener America where it's more expensive to live, in the middle of a recession when people have no money.
I've given a LOT of crap to Bush, called him "The Idiot in Chimp" actually, and I stand by every complaint I made. However, the Obama administration is shaping up to be just as bad.
One of Bush's biggest problems is that he was crap at speeches. Obama doesn't have that problem. Everything else though? Kee-rist. He might as well be the lovechild of Jimmy Carter and George Bush. All the bleeding heart, all the bad ideas, twice the stupidity.
You guys are so damn screwed.
Shifted wrote:I dont know who told you that lie if we arer fired thats is unless you have a drug problem they will get you help. but if you get fired you are done you get nothing. as far as this contract i voted he// no. take some pay from me not our parents who would vote yes.Knoxfire Esquire wrote:The Obama administration's dealing of the Automobile and Housing crisis are so hideously wrongheaded that I don't even know what to say anymore.
They're trying to fix the housing crash by not lowering the price of houses, which is what triggered the crash in the first place.
They're trying to fix the automobile crisis by not forcing unions to renegotiate their salaries, which is one of the major problems.
They're trying to form a greener America where it's more expensive to live, in the middle of a recession when people have no money.
I've given a LOT of crap to Bush, called him "The Idiot in Chimp" actually, and I stand by every complaint I made. However, the Obama administration is shaping up to be just as bad.
One of Bush's biggest problems is that he was crap at speeches. Obama doesn't have that problem. Everything else though? Kee-rist. He might as well be the lovechild of Jimmy Carter and George Bush. All the bleeding heart, all the bad ideas, twice the stupidity.
You guys are so damn screwed.
I'm sorry, but the housing crash was not due to high home prices. The housing crash was due to selling $500,000 homes to family's that make $40,000 per year using ARM loans. When the ARM's readjusted up, nobody could afford their payments, and suddenly all those families were defaulting on home loans. After that, they would get wages garnished, cut back on spending, and down comes the housing market. The problem was lending people money through programs with adjustable rates that they could never pay back.
The automobile crisis is definately in the unions, but not salaries so much as benefits. Even if a union employee is fired, they still get their wages, health benefits, etc for life, and all paid for by the automaker. The UAW should be ashamed of themselves, just because of health costs bore by the automaker, that added $1,500 to EVERY CAR they put out. Think about that for a minute.
Shifted wrote:and if you dont know the truth please dont spread more lies about us! hell my plant will be closed by dec of 2010. but i have been looking for a better job for years.Knoxfire Esquire wrote:The Obama administration's dealing of the Automobile and Housing crisis are so hideously wrongheaded that I don't even know what to say anymore.
They're trying to fix the housing crash by not lowering the price of houses, which is what triggered the crash in the first place.
They're trying to fix the automobile crisis by not forcing unions to renegotiate their salaries, which is one of the major problems.
They're trying to form a greener America where it's more expensive to live, in the middle of a recession when people have no money.
I've given a LOT of crap to Bush, called him "The Idiot in Chimp" actually, and I stand by every complaint I made. However, the Obama administration is shaping up to be just as bad.
One of Bush's biggest problems is that he was crap at speeches. Obama doesn't have that problem. Everything else though? Kee-rist. He might as well be the lovechild of Jimmy Carter and George Bush. All the bleeding heart, all the bad ideas, twice the stupidity.
You guys are so damn screwed.
I'm sorry, but the housing crash was not due to high home prices. The housing crash was due to selling $500,000 homes to family's that make $40,000 per year using ARM loans. When the ARM's readjusted up, nobody could afford their payments, and suddenly all those families were defaulting on home loans. After that, they would get wages garnished, cut back on spending, and down comes the housing market. The problem was lending people money through programs with adjustable rates that they could never pay back.
The automobile crisis is definately in the unions, but not salaries so much as benefits. Even if a union employee is fired, they still get their wages, health benefits, etc for life, and all paid for by the automaker. The UAW should be ashamed of themselves, just because of health costs bore by the automaker, that added $1,500 to EVERY CAR they put out. Think about that for a minute.
Jookycola wrote:No lies. The UAW is just another greedy factor why the big 3 are in as deep as they are. Stop trying to spin it like the UAW is not greedy, you're greedy, and it will cost you your job, get over it.( and these people built bombs and tanks planes guns for the past wars as well as hummers ) the uaw is not greedy they are just protecting what our parents worked so hard to get. working in very bad conditions working like slaves. there is a reason there are so-many people that can retire right now. because back in the late 60's and early 70's if you looked like you didn't want to do a job because it was dangerous they would flat out tell you we have 50 people waiting out side the gate that want your job. and we just have what all other big automakers get if not less. we don't have child care in house you don't hear what other automakers give their employees just us. hell some toyota employees make allot more than us.
But the main reason GM went down so fast was piss poor build quality and sub-par product. People gave them 2nd and 3rd chances and as the cars proved they were terrible/boring people moved on to other brands. The other side of that coin is service. GM service was/is horrid, they sold you garbage and if you needed it fixed they treat you like an @!#$ for wanting warranty service done to the car. GM just skipped by on their name for years in a crash and burn type of fashion. They did this to themselves.
Why am i so angry about this?
because not only did the taxpayers give these a-holes at GM billions in bailout money, we also gave billions to bailout their finacing arm GMAC. Now that they filed they don't have to pay that back and they won't extend any loans to anyone with a fico score over 700, which is like 10% of the buying public. So it was ok to take my money and squander it. But you won't dare give me a loan because my fico is 670...the average score by the way. The way i see it if we gave them money then they owe us to grant loans to people with real world fico scores. basically they are just loaning us back our money. They want people to buy GM and support GM, but won't give out loans then that's not our problem as far as i'm concerned.
Quote:
I'm sorry, but the housing crash was not due to high home prices. The housing crash was due to selling $500,000 homes to family's that make $40,000 per year using ARM loans.
Jookycola wrote:typical pro-UAW B.S. spin. Do you guys get a script you have to memorize or something?first i am not lazy i work 2 jobs! 2nd sounds like you are geting screwed thats not my fault. third i have worked for less with no health benifits. they can build over seas they just wont have people here that will buy it.
You are not a regular hourly worker. You don’t compare to a guy that works at a Lowe’s or the hourly McDonald’s worker. As a matter of fact I’m a nurse and union and I don’t get the wages or benefits you greedy UAW slobs get. And I save lives…what do you do? Bolt in a radio, bolt on a fender. Oh that’s really hard. If it’s back breaking work, then too bad you chose a life of labor, you should’ve known that walking in.
let’s face it if the job didn’t vastly over pay you and hand out unrealistic health care there is nothing remotely alluring to the job at all. You wouldn’t do it for $20.00 and hour and no health benefits. So stop making it sound like you’re doing so much for the american workers…all you’ve really done is make companies close jobs here and go overseas to get cheaper labor. The UAW and many other unions greed is killing america and costing jobs. Some unions are honest, but the UAW isn’t one of them
We will beat up the greedy, lazy UAW workers because you are just as much the problem as well. Deny it, spin it all you want but it’s true.
novaracer wrote: the real problem is free trade.
novaracer wrote:they can build over seas they just wont have people here that will buy it.
Evol...??? wrote:hey i guess i must just be stupid. but thats what i think. dosent matter to me i will only be a uaw member for a few more months. its time to move on to have better benifits an make more money. i took a paycut to work for GM but i had no benifits. thats why we all work there not because we like it so much but the money.novaracer wrote:they can build over seas they just wont have people here that will buy it.
Um, you are not really helping your case by arguing facts with stupidity. I hate to be the one to break it to you but…
they build cars in mexico and people buy them,
they build TV's & ipod’s in china people buy them,
they build Washer machines, Dell laptops in India people buy them.
They make 90% of the clothes you wear in Malaysia
Visit a Best Buy 99% of the products sold there are made outside the U.S. I don’t see them boarding up Best Buys anytime soon. Yes people will buy it, sadly the only person that will agree with any of your non-sensical rants would be a fellow Union brother. The rest of the people in the U.S pretty much think you’re all lazy, uneducated, whiney, overpaid, high school dropouts…your comments thus far seem to show that some stereotypes are based in reality.
So your pro-UAW martyr agenda spin still has no point. We've all heard the same UAW script your reading from a million times, your not going to win any sympathy.
Just stop, you don’t have a leg to stand on.
1996blackHB wrote:Game over????