Can't say as I know the warranty and its limitations, or if this falls within them. It's clear you feel it does. Good luck!
By the way...Did you let fellow know at the beginning of the call that you were recording him for public display? Critical legal aspect, at least here in the States...
Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:Can't say as I know the warranty and its limitations, or if this falls within them. It's clear you feel it does. Good luck!
By the way...Did you let fellow know at the beginning of the call that you were recording him for public display? Critical legal aspect, at least here in the States...
Don't have to let them know.
Quote:
1) Is it legal to record calls in Ontario without letting the other person know?
Canada requires "one-party notification" - only one person in the
conversation needs to be aware that the conversation is being taped.
In other words, the person taping the conversation must be
participating in it. You will find this law in the Criminal Code of
Canada.
CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: PART VI: INVASION OF PRIVACY:
Section 183.1: Where a private communication is originated by more
than one person or is intended by the originator thereof to be
received by more than one person, a consent to the interception
thereof by any one of those persons is sufficient consent for the
purposes of any provision of this Part. [1993, c.40, s.2.]"
http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/cc/cc.183.1.html
Definitions:
"A one party state means one party to the telephone conversation has
to have knowledge and give consent. In a two party state, all parties
must have knowledge and give consent."
"In Ontario, Canada... it is only legal to tape a conversation when at
least ONE of the people involved in the conversation is aware that it
is being recorded."
http://www.telephonemagic.com/call_recording_equipment.htm
I think many states use the same law.
Thanks...you are correct. I looked into it a bit more. It does indeed vary from state to state in the USA, and may even require that both parties be in the same state, so interstate calls are yet another dimension.
But Canada is still not our "51st state", so your laws obviously rule. Thanks, I learned a lot on this...and good luck, if you are due covereage, I hope you get it.
Bill Hahn Jr. wrote:Thanks...you are correct. I looked into it a bit more. It does indeed vary from state to state in the USA, and may even require that both parties be in the same state, so interstate calls are yet another dimension.
But Canada is still not our "51st state", so your laws obviously rule. Thanks, I learned a lot on this...and good luck, if you are due covereage, I hope you get it.
I think you have it wrong, Canada will invade the USA. Did you not watch South Park? lol!
Cheers! and thanks for looking!
Blame Canada! lol, great stuff
You're welcome, thanks too
cliffs for the time-deprived?
and yes, notification for recording a conversation definitely varies from state to state. luckily, WV only requires one party to know of the recording.
Good luck with the rim situation, your going to need it. A friends son had to sue Chrysler to get his rim fixed, but Dodge fixed his mothers rim under warranty without a single issue. Another friend had to give Ford a bunch of hell because the paint and clearcoat was literally peeling of his Shelby GT. He eventually called Shelby up and after talking to a few people they decided to totally repaint it under warranty, of course the dealership in town they told him to take it to for the work did a half ass job and it came out looking worse than it did going in and he chewed them out until they covered a full detail job from the place of his choosing. Guess it just depends on who you talk to sometimes.
you should call them back and tell them you want a free rim job
