Alright so I'm just wrapping up with some major winter rejigs on the car.
Next in sight is finally getting a built engine to swap into the cav so I can crank up the boost.
My original idea was to find a donor LSJ and swap the internals into my L61 with a 2.2 eagle crank and external trigger wheel. But now I'm considering swapping either the LSJ head, or the whole damn thing into the car.
I guess my question is, is it worth the extra work to swap the LSJ into the cav, or is my original route the one of least resistance? I would rather tear down and rebuild the engine on a stand instead of a whole whack of in-car wiring. And since I'm only shooting for the 4-500hp range, I'm sure the L61 could handle that no problem with some beefed up guts.
Turbocharged '04 Cavalier
You can't swap cranks like that. You need to use either complete rotating assembly in either block. The lsj crank has the wrong trigger wheel so you'd have to address that either way. Easiest way is forged rods and pistons in the l61 and run it. A little harder but doable would be running the LSJ head with that forged l61 bottom end.
The rest is my personal opinion:
Running the complete LSJ is possible but just more issues. The up-side to an LSJ/LSJ crank is that you get much better clutch options. Ie, the GMPP upgraded clutch that is cheap and reliable at those numbers (assuming torque is in the same ballpark). I'll get flamed for this, but I don't suggest an external trigger wheel for the crank sensor (assuming that you plan to use the stock p11 pcm). If you search you'll find that someone makes a bolt-on trigger that goes on the crank internally in place of the original 58x. That's the way to go.
I know guys that built l61s and rev them to 8400rpm and keep making power. If you look at the rod stroke ratios, the LSJ should rev better and be happier up there. It's really up to you. Stock for stock, I miss my LSJ bottom end at 7500rpm. With an LSJ head and cams on both bottom ends, the LSJ bottom end was definitely peppier and more fun. That said, L61 compression is higher and stock sized forged pistons are a lot cheaper than customs for the LSJ to make up the difference. You may say that with boost you should lower compression but at 17psi the LSJ could have used that extra bump that the L61 has. I suggest aiming for at least 10:1 if this is going to be a street/strip motor.
Keep in mind that the LSJ has bigger wrist pins, piston squirters, 8 bolt flywheel (GMPP clutch compatibility), better rod/stroke ratio (if revving is what you're planning to do), and an oil cooler that you could run an adapter on for an aftermarket front mount cooler (the stock cooler doesn't fit with the f23 trans linkage, assuming this is a 5 speed car).
L61 bolts right in, has the right trigger wheel, is easy and cheap to replace.
LSJ head is nice but doesn't really get you anything for the trouble until you port it. It has more meat so that you can port larger than an L61. It also requires you to figure out a cam sensor cover plate (cam sensor is unused by the p11 and doesn't fit over the master cylinder), and you either have to heavily modify your l61 coil pack or convert to LSJ individual coils (which will kill your cruising mileage because you'll always be running in batch fire mode without the fake cam signal from the jbody ICM).
Think that covers most of it.
"In Oldskool we trust"
What sort of things, aside from the crank trigger, would prevent me from using a 2.2 eagle crank in an LSJ block? I have a set of LSJ rods, and I knew about the wrist pin sizes, so I figured I could just use LSJ pistons with them.
What I'll probably end up doing is just using the LSJ valvetrain in the 2.2, with forged bottom end components, and keep the 10:1 compression ratio.
Turbocharged '04 Cavalier
bloodnthunder wrote:What sort of things, aside from the crank trigger, would prevent me from using a 2.2 eagle crank in an LSJ block? I have a set of LSJ rods, and I knew about the wrist pin sizes, so I figured I could just use LSJ pistons with them.
You would need to do a lot of measuring to figure that out. But considering that the L61 and LSJ rods are almost the same length and the L61 crank has a bigger offest, you'll probably end up with a combination that doesn't work with the deck height. The wrist pin locations are different in the respective pistons, too.
bloodnthunder wrote:What I'll probably end up doing is just using the LSJ valvetrain in the 2.2, with forged bottom end components, and keep the 10:1 compression ratio.
Do this. Easy, makes sense, parts are available.
LSJ valvetrain is almost the same. The springs are the same part number and I believe the intake valves are too. The LSJ exhaust valves are supposedly "sodium filled" for higher temps but in reality they seem to fail more often in terms of leaking compression and needing resurfaced sooner. All gen 1 ecotec valves are stainless so it's not a big deal. Lash adjusters between L61 and LSJ are the same, and depending on year so are the followers. LNF followers were an updated part (machined vs stamped) but plenty of those have broken too so they're not a must. GM has updated the lash adjusters twice under the same part number. The last I checked, ZZP sells the 1st revision. When I went to a dealership they had the 2nd revision that I wish I would have gone with; they seemed way more thought out in terms of oil flow and rigidity.
If you use the LSJ head, use the LSJ head gasket as it's a factory MLS piece. Pro-tip, crate engine depot sells a head gasket repair kit for a cobalt SS or a Saturn Ion Redline. The redline kit was at least 50 bucks cheaper for exactly the same gaskets and parts. No one could tell me why. The kit comes with all head bolts (honestly the stockers clamp pretty well), head/intake/exhaust gaskets, fel-pro(my suggested brand) valve seals. Totally worth the money.
"In Oldskool we trust"